Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Recommended filesystem replacement for FFS... SFS or PFS?  (Read 4978 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline xeron

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 2533
    • Show only replies by xeron
    • http://www.petergordon.org.uk
Re: Recommended filesystem replacement for FFS... SFS or PFS?
« Reply #14 from previous page: January 07, 2004, 04:34:23 PM »
Well, dir cache is an attempt to make reading directories a little faster. It kind of makes sense on floppy disks, but on hard disks it gives no gain, but causes more pain.

Using FFS-DC on hard disks takes up space on the disk, uses more RAM, and makes the already annoying validation process take a lot longer.

A more detailed description is in this publically readable CAM article by Olaf Barthel. Scroll down to section 1.6.
Playstation Network ID: xeron6
 

Offline StevenJGoreTopic starter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2003
  • Posts: 347
    • Show only replies by StevenJGore
Re: Recommended filesystem replacement for FFS... SFS or PFS?
« Reply #15 on: January 07, 2004, 04:49:24 PM »
Quote
Using FFS-DC on hard disks takes up space on the disk, uses more RAM, and makes the already annoying validation process take a lot longer.


Ahh... that explains a few things!

Quote
If you decide to go SFS or PFS, I bet you'll be pleasantly surprised. :-)


Sounds like I will!

One last question... If I format all my hard disk partitions using SFS, and I boot workbench from a floppy, will the hard disk partitions be visible? Do I need to put SmartFilesystem in the L directory of everything I boot from?
 

Offline Neo

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Oct 2003
  • Posts: 77
    • Show only replies by Neo
Re: Recommended filesystem replacement for FFS... SFS or PFS?
« Reply #16 on: January 07, 2004, 07:16:11 PM »
@StevenJGore

To use SFS you just have to use HDToolBox to add the FileSystem to the harddisks RDB. Simply, open the partition view and chose 'Add FileSystem'. You also need to specify the FileSystem to use for your partition.

After that your HD controller should load the FileSystem and mount the drive automatically independent from which media you boot.

If you have multiple controllers I recommend to use the latest HDToolBox that is in OS3.9 BB2.
A3000D CyberstormPPC 040/25 (oc. 40MHz), 604e/180, 128MB Ram, CyberVisionPPC, AriadneII, AmigaOS 3.9 BB2, MiamiDX, Voyager 3.3, SMB-Handler, FroggerNG, Compal 15\\" TFT Monitor
 

Offline StevenJGoreTopic starter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2003
  • Posts: 347
    • Show only replies by StevenJGore
Re: Recommended filesystem replacement for FFS... SFS or PFS?
« Reply #17 on: January 08, 2004, 10:13:37 AM »
UPDATE:

I installed SFS 1.214 on my CD32's HD last night. Partitioning, installing SFS in the RDB, formatting, and installation of OS3.9 etc. went perfectly, and everything has been fine since. Goodbye to long validations after crashes! Hopefully I won't look back.

Thanks for everyone's help and advice yesterday!

Steve.
 

Offline zipper

Re: Recommended filesystem replacement for FFS... SFS or PFS?
« Reply #18 on: January 08, 2004, 12:11:26 PM »
Seems you can somehow live with FFS: I did accidentally delete (format quick)  my Games 19 GB partition instead of my backup partition so  I got a reason to test Jörg's DiskMonTools in action. I got everything back in about 1.5 hrs. Next time I'll double check what to delete...
 

Offline mikey2001

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2003
  • Posts: 377
    • Show only replies by mikey2001
Re: Recommended filesystem replacement for FFS... SFS or PFS?
« Reply #19 on: January 08, 2004, 01:46:13 PM »
I use PFS 3 on my A3000 and A2000 and I have had no problems with it so far.  :-)
Mike
 

Offline Jope

Re: Recommended filesystem replacement for FFS... SFS or PFS?
« Reply #20 on: January 08, 2004, 01:57:45 PM »
Same here, PFS3 everywhere.. A4k, A2k, Amithlon (when I was running it), Pegasos..

It's grrrrreat!^TM