A1260, why does wanting to transfer registration to an entirely different machine - therefore making the original registered copy of the software entirely inoperable in anything other than "demo" 30 minute form on the initial machine make a person a pirate? Ludicrous claims out of some of you. To reiterate: User regs the OS on Mac #1. User buys a better Mac to use, wants to transfer the OS license to the new Mac, therefore making the initial license entirely invalid on "Mac 1". User keeps Mac 1 for OS X, Linux, or a doorstop, not that it matters much what he does with it, the end result being is "Mac 1" is no longer considered a MOS box. How's that equal piracy in the least?
No one wants to invest in one machine/one copy of an OS that they may only use the HW short term, then either be stuck with a copy of an OS on something that's sitting in a closet. Mac minis make great little linux servers, and that's what I keep 'em around for and will never sell a single one of them (and ebay is a PITA).
Again, read slowly: some people have no interest in dicking around selling old equipment/SW license combos on ebay if they choose to upgrade to better HW. When I buy a beefier Mac for MOS, there should be an option to decommission that copy on the now unused hardware, even if it's a pay for service for the reg transfer. AGAIN - no one is wanting to run 1 copy on 50 different machines, we're talking OS locked to a particular machine. If I want 10 MOS rigs, I'll register it 10 times and I always pay for what I use.
Has absolutely NOTHING to do with piracy and tbh the implications are rather sad, lol. How the concept of "1 copy paid for, 1 copy used" got so bent out of shape is beyond me.
I'm fine with MOS handling regs as they see fit, but this piracy babble from the fanboys, nah, lol. I was very eager to start developing for the platform, but man - some of you guys sure can put a guy off with lack of logic.
ONE COPY BOUGHT, ONE COPY USED = PIRACY? Sorry, your logic is retarded.