And specifically G3 which had abysmal performance. Peg2 with G4 is a lot faster. I wonder why he didn't compare it against that?
They're not. They're to be expected with proper bus management. Atari accelerators have had this for ages for instance.
And wy you do not post values of the G3 600 ?
Gunnar write that natami is faster in memory transfer as a PPC with 600 MHZ.So you should test it with a PPC run at 600 MHZ, if you want something usefull post.
when somebody write a 100 MHZ PPC is in memory transfer faster as a 200 MHZ X86 and a guy post that is not true, my 2.6 GHZ PC have this faster transfer rate.
and also remember natami is a shared memory design, and it is able to read and write fast to gfx card.maybe it is here faster as a Mac mini too.
how fast the fastest MOS able systems(i guess MOS do not support PCIe) can read and write data to or from GFX Card ?
You can not compare performance with a FPGA system good.natami can get routines in vhdl that work lots faster.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconfigurable_computingalso when a amiga is oin fpga it can produce forerver, no miss Chips that not produce anymore or hard to get in small quantities.If the fpga is not produce, simple use another fpga and natami run more faster.lets see how powerfull fpga are in 10 years and which MOS or OS4 Hardware is then here
>Comparing the results against 7447 with 166MHz bus and proper chipset would have >given a slightly different picture:
>write: 774 MB/s
>read: 375MB/s
My I5 760 PC with DDR3 and winuae reach (remember X86 need byteswap the data)
read fast long 1624 MB/sec
write fast long 1218 MB/sec
fast2fast long 1082 MB/sec
fast2fastm 2492 MB /sec
and btw a 68k in fpga with the powerful movem instruction, can be lots faster access mem.
