Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: No seriously this could be the future of Amiga  (Read 3817 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ElPolloDiablTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 1702
    • Show only replies by ElPolloDiabl
No seriously this could be the future of Amiga
« on: January 13, 2011, 01:53:56 PM »
DARPA says that they have a way to make custom ICs on small production runs using electron beams to etch the silicon.

Article here, don't forget to read some of the comments.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/01/12/darpa_asic_announcement/
Go Go Gadget Signature!
 

Offline tone007

Re: No seriously this could be the future of Amiga
« Reply #1 on: January 13, 2011, 02:03:06 PM »
No seriously I'm gonna make Amigas with a blowtorch and gelatin.
3 Commodore file cabinets, 2 Commodore USB turntables, 1 AmigaWorld beer mug
Alienware M14x i7 laptop running AmigaForever
 

Offline jorkany

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2006
  • Posts: 1009
    • Show only replies by jorkany
    • http://www.amigaos4.com
Re: No seriously this could be the future of Amiga
« Reply #2 on: January 13, 2011, 03:27:32 PM »
I wasn't aware that Amiga Inc. or CUSA had any plans to get into chip design, much less manufacture. Can you connect the dots for those of us who are less imaginative?
 

Offline TheBilgeRat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 1657
    • Show only replies by TheBilgeRat
Re: No seriously this could be the future of Amiga
« Reply #3 on: January 13, 2011, 03:28:34 PM »
That is actually pretty neat!  Although, I think their idea of "small scale" is still pretty big.
 

Offline Ilwrath

Re: No seriously this could be the future of Amiga
« Reply #4 on: January 13, 2011, 03:31:53 PM »
Quote
No seriously I'm gonna make Amigas with a blowtorch and gelatin.

Cool!  This is a breakthrough!  Where's your waiting list?


(The beam etching does actually sound very cool...  But, seriously...  I have a feeling the price will be WAY out of hobbiest reach for quite some time.)
« Last Edit: January 13, 2011, 03:34:28 PM by Ilwrath »
 

Offline vidarh

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2010
  • Posts: 409
    • Show only replies by vidarh
Re: No seriously this could be the future of Amiga
« Reply #5 on: January 13, 2011, 03:38:08 PM »
Quote from: jorkany;606420
I wasn't aware that Amiga Inc. or CUSA had any plans to get into chip design, much less manufacture. Can you connect the dots for those of us who are less imaginative?


The Natami people, on the other hand, might find this very interesting if they're looking to do new, faster models a few years down the line and their 68050 (or successor) and SuperAGA cores are well tested. It could allow them to reach far faster speeds very cheaply in comparison to keeping everything on FPGAs.

I for one couldn't care less if it bears the actual name Amiga or not - I care more about what software it'd run.

For that matter, if it gets cheap enough, someone might step up to the plate and offer replacement chips for actual classics for repairs etc.

Of course none of this is much better than free fantasy right now, given that the technology is likely years away from commercialization and even further away from being affordable *enough* for "our" use.
 

Offline jorkany

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2006
  • Posts: 1009
    • Show only replies by jorkany
    • http://www.amigaos4.com
Re: No seriously this could be the future of Amiga
« Reply #6 on: January 13, 2011, 03:50:02 PM »
Quote from: vidarh;606424
Of course none of this is much better than free fantasy right now, given that the technology is likely years away from commercialization and even further away from being affordable *enough* for "our" use.


Agreed. In fact I don't get the impression from the article that this is about making chip manufacture possible for your typical man-on-the-street, or even small businesses. The title even says: "Custom ICs in small numbers to be cheap as (normal) chips". I read this as, this will reduce cost overhead for small batches, but that's about it.
 

Offline KThunder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 1509
    • Show only replies by KThunder
Re: No seriously this could be the future of Amiga
« Reply #7 on: January 13, 2011, 05:33:35 PM »
I think minimig shows the future of custom Amiga hardware. I don't think we are cutting edge enough for experimental manufacturing techniques.

Interesting stuff though.
Oh yeah?!?
Well your stupid bit is set,
and its read only!
(my best geek putdown)
 

Offline Hattig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 901
    • Show only replies by Hattig
Re: No seriously this could be the future of Amiga
« Reply #8 on: January 13, 2011, 05:52:17 PM »
This technology would have to make it into mainstream production first - that could still be years away. However once it is done, I'm sure that major foundries will pick it up.

However how much would making 100 Natami cores on this process cost? It's probably still more than 100 FPGAs. And in two years time the FPGAs will be cheaper for the same features, or faster and larger for the same cost. If Natami has something performing like a >200MHz 68060 later this year already, I think we'll be okay for classic Amiga enhancements for a while :-)
 

Offline nicholas

Re: No seriously this could be the future of Amiga
« Reply #9 on: January 13, 2011, 05:54:57 PM »
Quote from: Ilwrath;606422
Cool!  This is a breakthrough!  Where's your waiting list?


(The beam etching does actually sound very cool...  But, seriously...  I have a feeling the price will be WAY out of hobbiest reach for quite some time.)


Two more weeks.
“Een rezhim-i eshghalgar-i Quds bayad az sahneh-i ruzgar mahv shaved.” - Imam Ayatollah Sayyed  Ruhollah Khomeini
 

Offline A1260

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 693
    • Show only replies by A1260
Re: No seriously this could be the future of Amiga
« Reply #10 on: January 13, 2011, 07:14:10 PM »
Quote from: nicholas;606440
Two more weeks.


hahahaha! :D
 

Offline Iggy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 5348
    • Show only replies by Iggy
Re: No seriously this could be the future of Amiga
« Reply #11 on: January 13, 2011, 07:42:50 PM »
Neat technology. Sounds really complicated though.
Shouldn't you have titled this Another possibility for the future of the Amiga?
Since the Amiga doesn't have just one future, its a multiplicity of futures.
"Not making any hard and fast rules means that the moderators can use their good judgment in moderation, and we think the results speak for themselves." - Amiga.org, terms of service

"You, got to stem the evil tide, and keep it on the the inside" - Rogers Waters

"God was never on your side" - Lemmy

Amiga! "Our appeal has become more selective"
 

Offline Kesa

  • Ninja Fruit Slasher
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 2408
    • Show only replies by Kesa
Re: No seriously this could be the future of Amiga
« Reply #12 on: January 14, 2011, 01:38:22 AM »
Quote from: Ilwrath;606422
Cool!  This is a breakthrough!  Where's your waiting list?


(The beam etching does actually sound very cool...  But, seriously...  I have a feeling the price will be WAY out of hobbiest reach for quite some time.)

Ahem... www.amiga.org/forums/group.php?groupid=50
Even my cat doesn\'t like me.
 

Offline tone007

Re: No seriously this could be the future of Amiga
« Reply #13 on: January 14, 2011, 03:18:47 AM »
Screw you, Kelsey.
3 Commodore file cabinets, 2 Commodore USB turntables, 1 AmigaWorld beer mug
Alienware M14x i7 laptop running AmigaForever
 

Offline vidarh

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2010
  • Posts: 409
    • Show only replies by vidarh
Re: No seriously this could be the future of Amiga
« Reply #14 on: January 14, 2011, 09:35:10 AM »
Quote from: Hattig;606439
This technology would have to make it into mainstream production first - that could still be years away. However once it is done, I'm sure that major foundries will pick it up.

However how much would making 100 Natami cores on this process cost? It's probably still more than 100 FPGAs.


Who knows? But the Reg claims their aim is for it to bring the unit costs for single wafer runs (anything from a couple of hundred to a couple of thousand units depending on size of the chips and wafers) down to the same as you get for large scale runs, so presumably that'd mean prices comparable to off the shelf Intel or AMD CPU's *if* the Register hasn't massively misreported it and *if* they meet their goals... Those are of course two very big if's :)

Quote

 And in two years time the FPGAs will be cheaper for the same features, or faster and larger for the same cost. If Natami has something performing like a >200MHz 68060 later this year already, I think we'll be okay for classic Amiga enhancements for a while :-)


Keep in mind they're looking at producing sub 65nm chips. Even at 65nm a good design could let you get to at least 2GHz+ (AMD's Phenom series for example reached at least 2.6GHz on 65nm). If this tech pans out and becomes as cheap as they are aiming for, it'll wipe the floor with FPGA's for anything where speed matters and people have the skills and time to do the designs. Though there's still the increased complexity of designing/verifying a design that can handle those speeds reliably, so whether it'd actually make a difference for projects like Natami really boils down to how good they are at chip design.

I for one would love to get a 2GHz+ m68k compatible CPU, but I'm not holding my breath quite yet :)

For now it's all speculation, but it'll be fun to see where it goes... If they succeed it'll be a *major* upset of the chip business, since so much of it now is centered around a dependency on this small number of multi-billion dollar fabs and a massive barrier of entry for small chip design companies. If that changes you're likely to see tons of new startups try their hand at designing everything from new CPU's to very specialized ASICs for specific purposes.