Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: ZorRAM vs. Busters  (Read 17226 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline kolla

Re: ZorRAM vs. Busters
« Reply #29 on: August 31, 2010, 12:51:40 AM »
Quote from: HammerD;576670
I wish some enterprising individual would make a new Buster Rev.12 to fix all the lame bugs and limitations and make it faster....single DMA busmaster sucks (not to mention, it would be nice if Zorro 3 was faster.


One can dream :)
B5D6A1D019D5D45BCC56F4782AC220D8B3E2A6CC
---
A3000/060CSPPC+CVPPC/128MB + 256MB BigRAM/Deneb USB
A4000/CS060/Mediator4000Di/Voodoo5/128MB
A1200/Blz1260/IndyAGA/192MB
A1200/Blz1260/64MB
A1200/Blz1230III/32MB
A1200/ACA1221
A600/V600v2/Subway USB
A600/Apollo630/32MB
A600/A6095
CD32/SX32/32MB/Plipbox
CD32/TF328
A500/V500v2
A500/MTec520
CDTV
MiSTer, MiST, FleaFPGAs and original Minimig
Peg1, SAM440 and Mac minis with MorphOS
 

Offline magnetic

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 2531
    • Show only replies by magnetic
Re: ZorRAM vs. Busters
« Reply #30 on: August 31, 2010, 03:57:05 AM »
HammerD
I'm jeoulous of your classic a4k setup! I used to have a amiga tech 4000T w phase ppc and cybervisionppc but sold it when I got into pegasos. Boy i'd love to have that thing back! how is the ZoroRam board compared to say a DKB 3128 >?
bPlan Pegasos2 G4@1ghz
Quad Boot:Reg. MorphOS | OS4.1 U4 |Ubuntu GNU-Linux | MacOS X

Amiga 2000 Rom Switcher w/ 3.1 + 1.3 | HardFrame SCSI | CBM Ram board| A Squared LIVE! 2000 | Vlab Motion | Firecracker 24 gfx

Commodore CDTV: 68010 | ECS | 9mb Ram | SCSI -TV | 3.9 Rom | Developer EPROMs
 

Offline alexh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2005
  • Posts: 3645
    • Show only replies by alexh
    • http://thalion.atari.org
Re: ZorRAM vs. Busters
« Reply #31 on: September 02, 2010, 09:34:38 PM »
Quote from: magnetic;576867
how is the ZoroRam board compared to say a DKB 3128 >?
Erm, the same? Cept DKB 3128 works in all Amiga's regardless of buster?
« Last Edit: September 03, 2010, 01:50:09 PM by alexh »
 

Offline amigakit

Re: ZorRAM vs. Busters
« Reply #32 on: September 02, 2010, 11:56:54 PM »
Compared to the DKB3128, the new ZorRAM is cheaper than many DKB3128s sold second hand on Ebay.  ZorRAM is also available in 256MB version and available new with warranty.  ZorRAM uses SDRAM technology rather than SIMMs
www.AmigaKit.com - Amiga Reseller | Manufacturer | Developer

New Products  --   Customer Help & Support -- @amigakit
 

Offline strimTopic starter

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Apr 2010
  • Posts: 89
    • Show only replies by strim
    • http://c0ff33.net/
Re: ZorRAM vs. Busters
« Reply #33 on: September 03, 2010, 09:34:22 AM »
Guys, any comment on Buster 7 compatibility?
 

Offline mboehmer_e3b

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 312
    • Show only replies by mboehmer_e3b
    • http://www.e3b.de/usb/
Re: ZorRAM vs. Busters
« Reply #34 on: September 05, 2010, 08:49:02 AM »
Quote from: strim;577496
Guys, any comment on Buster 7 compatibility?


Yes, only one: get a Buster 11 :-)

We haven't tested with Buster 7 - I think I have at least one crouching around in my spare part stuff, but Buster 7 is definitely outdated. My spare part is just for historical interests :-)

Michael
 

Offline strimTopic starter

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Apr 2010
  • Posts: 89
    • Show only replies by strim
    • http://c0ff33.net/
Re: ZorRAM vs. Busters
« Reply #35 on: September 05, 2010, 05:21:17 PM »
Quote from: mboehmer_e3b;577829
Yes, only one: get a Buster 11 :-)

We haven't tested with Buster 7 - I think I have at least one crouching around in my spare part stuff, but Buster 7 is definitely outdated. My spare part is just for historical interests :-)


Ok, I will acquire one, but I'm not sure if it will work in my A3000 (16MHz model).

Now my A3000 is equipped with ZorRAM, Deneb and A3640. This configuration is completly stable since I downgraded from Buster 9 to 7.
 

Offline Zac67

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2004
  • Posts: 2890
    • Show only replies by Zac67
Re: ZorRAM vs. Busters
« Reply #36 on: September 05, 2010, 06:24:58 PM »
A Buster 11 will reportedly not work at 16 MHz! According to Dave Haynie, it was neither designed nor tested for that speed.
You'll need to upgrade to 25 MHz (which I would've done long ago) - but why change anything when it's working fine?
 

Offline HammerD

Re: ZorRAM vs. Busters
« Reply #37 on: September 05, 2010, 06:41:25 PM »
Quote from: mboehmer_e3b;577829
Yes, only one: get a Buster 11 :-)

We haven't tested with Buster 7 - I think I have at least one crouching around in my spare part stuff, but Buster 7 is definitely outdated. My spare part is just for historical interests :-)

Michael


Hi Michael, you mention V10 Deneb firmware on your site in the FAQ? I assume this will come out at some point soon?

Also, I have two ZorRAM cards - how do I tell if they are affected by the Buster 9 problem?

Not that it really matters for me, my three A4000 systems have Buster-11.

Is there any remote possibility of making a buster-12 ? Fix the stupid bugs and faster would be nice.  I mean, it can't be too complex of a chip nowadays...
AmigaOS 4.x Beta Tester - Classic Amiga enthusiast - http://www.hd-zone.com is my Amiga Blog, check it out!
 

Offline strimTopic starter

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Apr 2010
  • Posts: 89
    • Show only replies by strim
    • http://c0ff33.net/
Re: ZorRAM vs. Busters
« Reply #38 on: September 05, 2010, 08:31:21 PM »
Quote from: Zac67;577879
A Buster 11 will reportedly not work at 16 MHz! According to Dave Haynie, it was neither designed nor tested for that speed.
You'll need to upgrade to 25 MHz (which I would've done long ago) - but why change anything when it's working fine?


Actually A3640 is clocked at 25MHz, but I don't know if Buster is using the same clock signal. If it is then my problem is solved :afro:.

Upgrading to Buster 11 does have some sense, because Buster 7 does not support DMA, and DMA is always a nice thing (especially with slow CPUs).
 

Offline Zac67

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2004
  • Posts: 2890
    • Show only replies by Zac67
Re: ZorRAM vs. Busters
« Reply #39 on: September 05, 2010, 08:42:49 PM »
Quote from: strim;577906
Actually A3640 is clocked at 25MHz, but I don't know if Buster is using the same clock signal. If it is then my problem is solved :afro:.


Sorry, missed that. The A3640 runs the board at 25 MHz, so it should be fine with the Buster 11 - but you should keep it in the back of your head in case you remove the '040 one day. ;)
 

Offline HammerD

Re: ZorRAM vs. Busters
« Reply #40 on: September 05, 2010, 09:17:33 PM »
Quote from: magnetic;576867
HammerD
I'm jeoulous of your classic a4k setup! I used to have a amiga tech 4000T w phase ppc and cybervisionppc but sold it when I got into pegasos. Boy i'd love to have that thing back! how is the ZoroRam board compared to say a DKB 3128 >?


Both my ZorRAM cards (I have two - one 128MB and one 256) work fine.

They aren't very fast because of Zorro 3 limitations, you'll max out at around 10MB/sec.  But it's nice to have nonetheless.  Better than trying to find a used DKB3128 which is next to impossible.  

As for my setups, yes they are nice.  I have actually three systems near identical setups, all with CS PPC's, two 233MHz versions and one 200MHz version upgraded to 366MHz ;)

And a CD32/SX32, but I have to admit that doesn't get much use :(
AmigaOS 4.x Beta Tester - Classic Amiga enthusiast - http://www.hd-zone.com is my Amiga Blog, check it out!
 

Offline X-ray

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2004
  • Posts: 4370
    • Show only replies by X-ray
Re: ZorRAM vs. Busters
« Reply #41 on: October 10, 2010, 02:26:28 PM »
So a ZorRAM has same read and write speed as a DKB3128?
 

Offline Karlos

  • Sockologist
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 16882
  • Country: gb
  • Thanked: 6 times
    • Show only replies by Karlos
Re: ZorRAM vs. Busters
« Reply #42 on: October 10, 2010, 02:31:48 PM »
Quote from: X-ray;583870
So a ZorRAM has same read and write speed as a DKB3128?


Well, I would expect that the limiting factor is going to be the bus in both cases.
int p; // A
 

Offline X-ray

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2004
  • Posts: 4370
    • Show only replies by X-ray
Re: ZorRAM vs. Busters
« Reply #43 on: October 10, 2010, 02:40:04 PM »
So all things being equal....they are equal (if you know what I mean)?
 

Offline Karlos

  • Sockologist
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 16882
  • Country: gb
  • Thanked: 6 times
    • Show only replies by Karlos
Re: ZorRAM vs. Busters
« Reply #44 from previous page: October 10, 2010, 02:40:40 PM »
Quote from: X-ray;583872
So all things being equal....they are equal (if you know what I mean)?

I expect so. Except you can get ZorRAM new...

Actually, one difference I observed when the showconfig output was posted was that several ZorRAM modules together formed a single contiguous block of memory, IIRC your experiments with the DKB seemed to have holes in the address range.
int p; // A