Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Would I be able to play MP3s with an 030?  (Read 5695 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Vulture

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2005
  • Posts: 310
    • Show only replies by Vulture
Re: Would I be able to play MP3s with an 030?
« Reply #44 from previous page: February 21, 2010, 10:45:33 AM »
Quote from: Hell Labs;544210
Hope kids in 2110 like whitesnake.


Sure they will, what's not to like?  ;-)
 

Offline Framiga

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2003
  • Posts: 4096
    • Show only replies by Framiga
Re: Would I be able to play MP3s with an 030?
« Reply #45 on: February 21, 2010, 11:36:12 AM »
Quote from: Karlos;543453
On my 040, I found that AHI v4.3 was the pinnacle in terms of performance. Using 14-bit calibrated audio on that was never a problem. Later m68k versions of AHI were far more CPU hungry on my machine.


absolutely! even on the 060 is very light (less accurate, probably but better even with a RTA card)
 

Offline radzik

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Feb 2010
  • Posts: 154
    • Show only replies by radzik
    • http://radzikowski.ovh.org
Re: Would I be able to play MP3s with an 030?
« Reply #46 on: February 21, 2010, 02:36:50 PM »
So the best option is use AHI v4.3 than 6.7?
Amiga 2000 2 MB Chip ECS, Blizzard 2060/60 MHz 128 MB Fast, Picasso II+, Deneb USB, 160 GB & DVD-RW / OS 3.9
Amiga 1200, Blizzard PPC 233/040 256 MB Fast, BVision / OS4.0, OS3.9,  MOS 1.45
 

Offline graffias79

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2003
  • Posts: 335
  • Country: us
  • Gender: Male
    • Show only replies by graffias79
Re: Would I be able to play MP3s with an 030?
« Reply #47 on: February 21, 2010, 06:06:30 PM »
Quote from: koshman;544206
Analog tapes over digital for longevity? You can't be serious...


CDs rot, hard drives fail, flash memory gets corrupted.  Unless in the presence of a strong magnetic field, analog tape will hold its contents indefinitely.
 

Offline save2600

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2006
  • Posts: 3261
  • Country: us
    • Show only replies by save2600
Re: Would I be able to play MP3s with an 030?
« Reply #48 on: February 21, 2010, 06:27:48 PM »
I second that. As an audiophile into a quite diverse collection of gear, I can confirm that ALL of my tapes (especially the Maxell XLII-S and MX-S tapes) perform as well as they did when I recorded them in the mid to late 80's. Even after surviving years and years in a car throughout all of the seasons. ALL of my CD recordable media from the mid 90's to mid 2000's are ALL rotting and they were all recorded on high-end dedicated CD-Audio recorders and various computer CD-ROM burners using all different types of blank media. They exhibit a jittery/scratchy/distorted sound and I had to throw away about 90% of my collections. Thankfully, I was smart and wise enough to know something "was up" with digital technology - especially one that relies on spinning a plastic disc with pits of dye at ridiculous speeds and kept most all of whatever format I was hoping to "back up".

I've had bad luck with HD's, CF cards, SD cards and pretty much any of these solid state mass storage devices. Whereas my reel-to-reel tapes, old cassette tapes for a TI-99/4A, VHS tapes, and analogue audio cassette tapes keep on keeping on.

Digital sucks for audio and most of the world has been duped into thinking otherwise. If people weren't so lazy and enjoyed the convenience that digital media offers, maybe they'd learn to listen better and trust their ears.
 

Offline m4rk1z

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Join Date: Feb 2010
  • Posts: 31
    • Show only replies by m4rk1z
Re: Would I be able to play MP3s with an 030?
« Reply #49 on: February 21, 2010, 06:45:20 PM »
Quote from: save2600;544252
I second that. As an audiophile into a quite diverse collection of gear, I can confirm that ALL of my tapes (especially the Maxell XLII-S and MX-S tapes) perform as well as they did when I recorded them in the mid to late 80's. Even after surviving years and years in a car throughout all of the seasons. ALL of my CD recordable media from the mid 90's to mid 2000's are ALL rotting and they were all recorded on high-end dedicated CD-Audio recorders and various computer CD-ROM burners using all different types of blank media. They exhibit a jittery/scratchy/distorted sound and I had to throw away about 90% of my collections. Thankfully, I was smart and wise enough to know something "was up" with digital technology - especially one that relies on spinning a plastic disc with pits of dye at ridiculous speeds and kept most all of whatever format I was hoping to "back up".

I've had bad luck with HD's, CF cards, SD cards and pretty much any of these solid state mass storage devices. Whereas my reel-to-reel tapes, old cassette tapes for a TI-99/4A, VHS tapes, and analogue audio cassette tapes keep on keeping on.

Digital sucks for audio and most of the world has been duped into thinking otherwise. If people weren't so lazy and enjoyed the convenience that digital media offers, maybe they'd learn to listen better and trust their ears.

You are completely right about this "Digital sucks for audio and most of the world has been duped into thinking otherwise."
I trashed milions of cd-s and nowday allmost all of my DVD movie discs are also lost - they wont work anymore (my VHS/BETA video movie collection still works great) but there are so much HD movies out there now and we all have fast internet connections today so it's no problem!
;p

I also have a great TAPE collection that works fine as then and i also record LP's making compilations for listening at home...  i m also a audiophile using all the best of '80 stuff like nakamichi, mcintosh, tannoy and vinyls for audio :)

My amiga 060 could only run shity MP3 (bljak) files in mono with "good"
quality and the one here that wrote "his friend could not hear the difference between mp3 and mp3" hahahaha must go to the doctor b/c i can hear difference between same audio CD's made from different audio companys!!! Normal people can HEAR differences if he JUST changes the audio cables in his system!
486 Pc's could only run stereo mp3 (128bit) at o/c speeds at 150/166Mhz.
:laughing:
that's why i did NOT use amiga for mp3, (i did only used mp3 files for my car b/c they was no good tape radios on the market) but you CAN use amigas for playing audio cd - that's not soo
bad depending at your home sound system!

cya...
« Last Edit: February 21, 2010, 06:52:22 PM by m4rk1z »
Ex-progamer & very proud owner of:
A500, A2000/60, M1538, CD32, C64C/G/2x1541 II, 2x1581, 2xAR7/8, C128, C128D, 2x1084S, 8xC2N, SNES, 3xCOINUP, XBOX1/360
 

Offline koshman

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 445
    • Show only replies by koshman
Re: Would I be able to play MP3s with an 030?
« Reply #50 on: February 21, 2010, 07:15:43 PM »
@ graffias79 & save2600:

Let's make it clear what we're talking here, guys. I'm not defending optical media (or anything else used for recording digital information) versus tapes. I'm talking about the principle of storing information as such - digital vs analog. Considering that I can make unlimited number of lossless copies of any digital content there can be NO doubt that it WILL last longer or at least has the potential to. When my tape dies, it's gone - I can make a copy, but it will be lossy and how many of those can I make while maintaining decent quality?

As for digital or analog being suitable for storing audio information, well, we all know CD limitations, but today with digital content distribution we are no longer limited to 16bit/44KHz. Now I don't know if SACD or DVDA or even higher rez formats sound better than good vinyl, but it is comparable at least. I have both a decent vinyl rig and SACD player and like both. Still I maintain that the biggest difference is always in the recording itself and its mastering - a well done redbook CD can sound miles better than a shitty LP.
- Radim
 
A600 - 68020/33, 10MB RAM, 3.1, 2GB SD
 

Offline m4rk1z

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Join Date: Feb 2010
  • Posts: 31
    • Show only replies by m4rk1z
Re: Would I be able to play MP3s with an 030?
« Reply #51 on: February 21, 2010, 07:28:56 PM »
Quote from: koshman;544264
@ graffias79 & save2600:

Let's make it clear what we're talking here, guys. I'm not defending optical media (or anything else used for recording digital information) versus tapes. I'm talking about the principle of storing information as such - digital vs analog. Considering that I can make unlimited number of lossless copies of any digital content there can be NO doubt that it WILL last longer or at least has the potential to. When my tape dies, it's gone - I can make a copy, but it will be lossy and how many of those can I make while maintaining decent quality?

As for digital or analog being suitable for storing audio information, well, we all know CD limitations, but today with digital content distribution we are no longer limited to 16bit/44KHz. Now I don't know if SACD or DVDA or even higher rez formats sound better than good vinyl, but it is comparable at least. I have both a decent vinyl rig and SACD player and like both. Still I maintain that the biggest difference is always in the recording itself and its mastering - a well done redbook CD can sound miles better than a shitty LP.


Re: Would I be able to play MP3s with an 030?
YES with a sound card!
:laughing:

@koshman
"a well done redbook CD can sound miles better than a shitty LP."
YES it can today in the year 2010 and it cost at least 4000-5000 euros for a great and/or modified player, under that price tag NOTHING can beat
those shitty LP's as you say!
:roflmao:
Ex-progamer & very proud owner of:
A500, A2000/60, M1538, CD32, C64C/G/2x1541 II, 2x1581, 2xAR7/8, C128, C128D, 2x1084S, 8xC2N, SNES, 3xCOINUP, XBOX1/360
 

Offline koshman

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 445
    • Show only replies by koshman
Re: Would I be able to play MP3s with an 030?
« Reply #52 on: February 21, 2010, 07:35:37 PM »
@ m4rk1z:

As if decent vinyl setup was cheap :D
- Radim
 
A600 - 68020/33, 10MB RAM, 3.1, 2GB SD
 

Offline save2600

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2006
  • Posts: 3261
  • Country: us
    • Show only replies by save2600
Re: Would I be able to play MP3s with an 030?
« Reply #53 on: February 21, 2010, 08:17:25 PM »
Quote from: koshman;544266
@ m4rk1z:

As if decent vinyl setup was cheap :D

Actually, in the astute audio world, it's well known you can invest in a much cheaper analogue rig and get much more satisfaction out of it than digital spent many times over. $350 for that new budget Rega is enough to blow away ANY digital player I've heard that cost less than $10k. Probably any digital rig at any cost. The two formats simply cannot sound like each other no matter how much money you spend. And yes, I currently have both SACD and DVD-Audio capable players. I like them for what they are (especially 2-channel SACD), but I'm talking in the area of imaging, realism. liquidity, smoothness & frequency response. No comparison to vinyl and the imaging especially is never right in the digital domain. If you have revealing enough speakers, you will find that the bulk of musical information in a stereo recording is squished and mono-like in the digital domain, whereas analogue allows the instruments to float beside, under, above and beyond your speakers.

AND... make no mistake about other formats that have come and gone. DCC for example. That's directly recording 1's and 0's to cassette and was, therefore, a true digital medium. So was the Adam tape drive technology from the 80's IIRC, that digitally recorded data to an analogue tape (metal formulated usually). And then there were a few VHS decks that had the ability to use their video heads, modulated in such a way as to record digital audio. Speaking of that, was the very short lived D-VHS medium (all digital of course)! All of these were superior technologies that went by the wayside partly because of the confusion the industries cast upon the general public during these ever continually volatile digital times. Nobody agreeing on standards and I also firmly believe they were quickly discarded because they are so long lasting. Every industry today wants you to re-purchase their goods. Over and over and over again. Anything that represents longevity must be cast out, else how are these greedy bastards going to continue to line their pockets for "innovation" or not? And that's what it's all about.

What we need and what I desire is a modern tape drive system one a consumer level with near-consumer replaceable parts (capstans, pinch rollers, belts) based on either compact cassette OR reel-to-reel so we can properly store our data or music - just like the big boys *still* do. What the Joe Sixpack consumer is sold today, is by and large, garbage designed to be obsolete as soon as you take it right out of the packaging. It's seriously flawed, sounds like crap, doesn't retain data for any real length of time and is essentially stripping people of the passion we once had for music, photography, gaming or whatever.  

Take the photography industry for example. Who hasn't lost valuable pics yet thanks to the flaws inherent in digital storage? You can't accidentally "delete" a negative the same way. Not to mention all the pics that are purposely being discarded because, all of the sudden, everybody is an "expert" photographer and critic. Psychology behind this phenomenon isn't rocket science, but seems again - most people would rather not recognize or deal with it. At the expense of quality, it's simply too much fun snapping cheesy pics off your phone camera, listening to mp3's on a seriously small wafer and all the other silly things people get a kick out of today. The world is just rife with cheese I guess.  :lol:

, yikes! Didn't mean to get so off topic... to remain on-topic, I would say that listening to a horrible format (mp3) on an Amiga is a futile exercise to say the least. Yes, it may be fun to play around with and experiment (did it myself) as that's always what it's been about classic computing wise, but to sit - even casually listen to music in the background like that, with horrible fidelity... your Amiga is better equipped performing some other worthwhile task. lol  May as well just play a CD back using a SCSI CD drive for superior results. I spent $60 on an external USB soundcard for my 060/Deneb equipped Miggy and was still disappointed in the performance of both the audio AND the "multi-tasking" ability of the Amiga.

Anyone want to buy a SoundBlaster X-Fi that's like new in the box? $40 shipped within the U.S.  :)
« Last Edit: February 21, 2010, 08:45:12 PM by save2600 »
 

Offline koshman

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 445
    • Show only replies by koshman
Re: Would I be able to play MP3s with an 030?
« Reply #54 on: February 21, 2010, 08:54:17 PM »
@ save2600:

You obviously know more about these things so I'm not gonna try and argue with you :)
I'm not sure we're on the same page though - so this is: digital on tape x digital on optical media? :) I wasn't commenting/objecting on that, but okay.

Btw, you mentioned that your burned CDRs from the late 90s haven't survived, which seems plausible, but do you have similar experience with pressed CDs?
- Radim
 
A600 - 68020/33, 10MB RAM, 3.1, 2GB SD
 

Offline save2600

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2006
  • Posts: 3261
  • Country: us
    • Show only replies by save2600
Re: Would I be able to play MP3s with an 030?
« Reply #55 on: February 21, 2010, 09:23:27 PM »
Quote from: koshman;544273
@ save2600:

You obviously know more about these things so I'm not gonna try and argue with you :)
I'm not sure we're on the same page though - so this is: digital on tape x digital on optical media? :) I wasn't commenting/objecting on that, but okay.

Btw, you mentioned that your burned CDRs from the late 90s haven't survived, which seems plausible, but do you have similar experience with pressed CDs?

No, I was merely pointing out the various formats that have come and gone. Especially ones that combined the technologies: digital recording onto magnetic or analogue media. I felt those were the best of both worlds for their various purposes. Today, I'd love to see magnetic tape digitally storing my computer data and files. For audio, I did like DCC when it was out and I had a couple of decks. AFAIK, they (in a very unorthodox move for Philips, completely ditched that format and do not make blank tapes any longer!). VERY weird for them and I would have continued to purchase tapes had they not ditched it so quickly. They were not the greatest at playing back analogue though and their internal design (a drawer that sucked the tape in) was totally undesirable as I like to properly maintain my decks.

It is my long experienced opinion that recordable optical media sucks. Mostly for audio, but since it's so poor with audio, I'd expect computer data to suffer similarly. I have not experienced as many defective CD-R's or DVD-R's when using them for data storage however, but my experience between the two hobbies are damn near polar opposite. Within the past few years though, I have "burned" several DVD's for people and myself. Only time will tell how well they hold up. No way am I going to throw out my childhood 8mm film videos thinking my DVD's are going to last  ;)   lmao!!

My pressed CD's seem to be fine, no matter how old they are - but I am aware of the phenomenon called 'bit rot'. I have one CD where the aluminum from the spindle to its outer edge *is* rotting though, but it does not affect the sound yet and that disc was made in Germany and from the early 80's. I have lots from the early-mid 80's still - but I believe they need to be treated in order to sound or look (if we're talking DVD) their best (same as brand new CD's, SACD's, DVD's, etc.) by a device that collapses the static or electro-magnetic field that surrounds them as a byproduct of the manufacturing process. It's not the aluminum that holds the static, it's the polycarbonate substrate that does. Think about it. You purchase a brand new CD that hasn't has it's magnetic field collapsed. I forget the exact specs, but that same statically charged CD spins at revolutions of something like 200rpm to 900rpm. Static field is enough to screw with the optical pickup since it's focusing beam is comprised of a coil that allows the lens to move up and down vertically. When (not if) that lens is not projecting a highly refined and focus beam, the optical part that reads the pits is not reading them accurately. Now, this is when the error correcting circuitry comes into play. Do you think any man made mathematical algorithm can possible fill in the blanks to the missing data/music/pits? No way Jose and that's why there's been so many different error correcting "filters" throughout the years. Best solution is to have the least amount of errors so that the error correcting circuitry doesn't have to kick in as much. Another reason why, as an audiophile, you don't want to be purchasing used CD's from careless people  ;)

Scratches aside, the absolutely best product I've ever used and continue to use to collapse the static field (and this field naturally recharges itself after so many plays - so you need to re-treat every so often) of a CD/DVD/SACD is called the Bedini Clarifyer. They have both a handheld unit and an "ultra" unit that has twice as much EM circuitry I believe. I have the handheld unit and I swear by it's effects both audibly and visually. On top of it enhancing the audio, it does wonders with video too. I've noticed the clarity more especially with newer films that have different mastering techniques (compressed digitally).

http://www.bedini.com/  

...these can be found at your better audio salons and are one of a handful of 'tweaks' that truly work. I had a friend recently purchase a used Rush CD the other day. It was a gold disc Mobile Fidelity Sound Lab CD, but it refused to play in any of his machines and the disk looked mint! Knowing I might have a solution, he brought his disc over for me to try. Before treating it with the clarifier, I plopped it into one of my machines. It refused to boot its table of contents! Treated both side of the CD and re-inserted. Voila! Damn thing played. lol  I was shocked that this device could/would provide such a drastic demonstration, but it did. Since then, I have been using it to treat any CD-R's I might make, just in case that was part of the problem with my discs from the 90's, etc. So far, so good. And no, I never bought the cheapest of the cheap of blank media. In fact, with a Harman Kardon & Pioneer CD recorder I once had, I was forced to purchase those expensive CD-Audio CD-R's. Regular CD-R's for use in a computer would not work with 'em  :(
« Last Edit: February 21, 2010, 09:41:45 PM by save2600 »
 

Offline Jose

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 2869
    • Show only replies by Jose
Re: Would I be able to play MP3s with an 030?
« Reply #56 on: February 21, 2010, 09:35:23 PM »
You can play it at full quality but you have to decode the files to a "raw" file 1st.

Regarding AHI, I thought 4.18 was the best version ?
Couldn't find any 4.3 version on Aminet either...
\\"We made Amiga, they {bleep}ed it up\\"
 

Offline koshman

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 445
    • Show only replies by koshman
Re: Would I be able to play MP3s with an 030?
« Reply #57 on: February 21, 2010, 09:37:27 PM »
Interesting, I've never heard of this EM issue. I'll look into it, thanks for the link.
- Radim
 
A600 - 68020/33, 10MB RAM, 3.1, 2GB SD
 

Offline Cammy

Re: Would I be able to play MP3s with an 030?
« Reply #58 on: February 21, 2010, 10:19:28 PM »
Quote from: LoadWB;543473
Problems with wav files?  I was playing wav files on my unaccelerated 500 with Play16 same as what you are doing.  I would use my friend's Windows 95 machine to rip a CD to 8-bit 11kHz stereo wav, and play it with Play16.  I played around with other sample rates for large wav files, but stuck mostly with 8-bit 11kHz since that was pretty much the best I could do with IFF files after conversion.  Also did well for file size, about 1MB per minute, pretty comparable to what I would get from a 128kbps MP3.


Do you still have the version of Play16 you used? I have been trying to find a program that will play streaming WAV files from HDD/CF/SD on my A600, but the version of Play16 on Aminet is only for 020+.

I have already converted a bunch of my CDs to WAV files and I'd love to be able to listen to them through the A600, but at the moment nothing I have tried from Aminet will work. They work beautifully with Play16 and SongPlayer on the A1200 though.

As for playing MP3s on the 030, SongPlayer and Prayer are probably the best to use to get the highest quality and have nice GUIs and playlists. The biggest problem I've found isn't the quality settings, but the bitrate of some MP3s. 128-192kbps MP3s will play perfectly on low-medium quality settings, but you can forget about playing 320kbps MP3s at all, unless you decode them to RAW/WAV/8SVX first.

One thing that works well is AmiNetRadio, which can stream online radio and podcasts in real-time from the internet, playing at low quality on a 030, but it never skips a beat and continues to multitask with other Internet applications running.
A1200 030@28Mhz/2MB+32MB/RTC/KS3.1/IDE-CF+4GB/4-Way Clockport Expander/IndivisionAGA/PCMCIA NIC
A1200 020@14Mhz/2MB+8MB/FPU/RTC/KS3.0/IDE-CF+2GB/S-Video
CD32 020@14Mhz/2MB+8MB/RTC/KS3.1/IDE-CF+4GB
A600 030@30Mhz/2MB+64MB/RTC/IDE-CF+4GB/Subway USB/S-Video/PCMCIA NIC/USB Numeric Keypad+Hub+Mouse+Control Pad
A500 000@7Mhz/512kB+512kB/ROM Switcher/KS3.1+1.3/S-Video

Get AmigaOS
 

Offline m4rk1z

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Join Date: Feb 2010
  • Posts: 31
    • Show only replies by m4rk1z
Re: Would I be able to play MP3s with an 030?
« Reply #59 on: February 22, 2010, 01:02:03 AM »
Quote from: save2600;544269
Actually, in the astute audio world, it's well known you can invest in a much cheaper analogue rig and get much more satisfaction out of it than digital spent many times over. $350 for that new budget Rega is enough to blow away ANY digital player I've heard that cost less than $10k. Probably any digital rig at any cost. The two formats simply cannot sound like each other no matter how much money you spend. And yes, I currently have both SACD and DVD-Audio capable players. I like them for what they are (especially 2-channel SACD), but I'm talking in the area of imaging, realism. liquidity, smoothness & frequency response. No comparison to vinyl and the imaging especially is never right in the digital domain. If you have revealing enough speakers, you will find that the bulk of musical information in a stereo recording is squished and mono-like in the digital domain, whereas analogue allows the instruments to float beside, under, above and beyond your speakers.

AND... make no mistake about other formats that have come and gone. DCC for example. That's directly recording 1's and 0's to cassette and was, therefore, a true digital medium. So was the Adam tape drive technology from the 80's IIRC, that digitally recorded data to an analogue tape (metal formulated usually). And then there were a few VHS decks that had the ability to use their video heads, modulated in such a way as to record digital audio. Speaking of that, was the very short lived D-VHS medium (all digital of course)! All of these were superior technologies that went by the wayside partly because of the confusion the industries cast upon the general public during these ever continually volatile digital times. Nobody agreeing on standards and I also firmly believe they were quickly discarded because they are so long lasting. Every industry today wants you to re-purchase their goods. Over and over and over again. Anything that represents longevity must be cast out, else how are these greedy bastards going to continue to line their pockets for "innovation" or not? And that's what it's all about.

What we need and what I desire is a modern tape drive system one a consumer level with near-consumer replaceable parts (capstans, pinch rollers, belts) based on either compact cassette OR reel-to-reel so we can properly store our data or music - just like the big boys *still* do. What the Joe Sixpack consumer is sold today, is by and large, garbage designed to be obsolete as soon as you take it right out of the packaging. It's seriously flawed, sounds like crap, doesn't retain data for any real length of time and is essentially stripping people of the passion we once had for music, photography, gaming or whatever.  

Take the photography industry for example. Who hasn't lost valuable pics yet thanks to the flaws inherent in digital storage? You can't accidentally "delete" a negative the same way. Not to mention all the pics that are purposely being discarded because, all of the sudden, everybody is an "expert" photographer and critic. Psychology behind this phenomenon isn't rocket science, but seems again - most people would rather not recognize or deal with it. At the expense of quality, it's simply too much fun snapping cheesy pics off your phone camera, listening to mp3's on a seriously small wafer and all the other silly things people get a kick out of today. The world is just rife with cheese I guess.  :lol:

, yikes! Didn't mean to get so off topic... to remain on-topic, I would say that listening to a horrible format (mp3) on an Amiga is a futile exercise to say the least. Yes, it may be fun to play around with and experiment (did it myself) as that's always what it's been about classic computing wise, but to sit - even casually listen to music in the background like that, with horrible fidelity... your Amiga is better equipped performing some other worthwhile task. lol  May as well just play a CD back using a SCSI CD drive for superior results. I spent $60 on an external USB soundcard for my 060/Deneb equipped Miggy and was still disappointed in the performance of both the audio AND the "multi-tasking" ability of the Amiga.

Anyone want to buy a SoundBlaster X-Fi that's like new in the box? $40 shipped within the U.S.  :)

Man! I m so happy that someone really knows what he is talking about, so i m not the only one here who thinks MP3 is music (sound) without soul!
:laughing:
Greatly explained about sound coming from 2 speakers making sound in the room like you where at the hall, not mentioning that you can also hear individual musicans sitting nearer or deeper back or at a different height!
;p
save2.6 have you ever tried to record music at VHS or better BETAmax?
I compared them against many cd players and the result was fascinating good!!! I also made some video backup systems to backup all my amiga stuff/discs to vhs tape also (on good high grade ones) for archiving them.
Yes they all work today like many many C-64 tapes that are older more than 20 years and works also very well, i made some copy units for making exact copys of tapes to have them just in case...

Sorry for OT people!
:)
« Last Edit: February 22, 2010, 01:04:45 AM by m4rk1z »
Ex-progamer & very proud owner of:
A500, A2000/60, M1538, CD32, C64C/G/2x1541 II, 2x1581, 2xAR7/8, C128, C128D, 2x1084S, 8xC2N, SNES, 3xCOINUP, XBOX1/360