AmigaOS4 Petunia benchmarks

[rachy]

I published new benchmarks on my web pages from the recent vesion of the dynamic recompiling based M68k emulator for AmigaOS4.

This version is already converted to AmigaOS4, and running on the native PowerPC system.

Petunia homepage

[Elwood]

One comment: Wow !

[FuZion]

Oh boy oh boy oh boy!!!!

[SlimJim]

This version is already converted to AmigaOS4, and running on the native PowerPC system.

 
Is this to interpreted as "the integration of the emulator is
complete"?
.
SlimJim

[HyperionMP]

No, the actual integration is primarily the work of a different developer.

The concept is however finalised and implementation can begin now that Petunia is running on OS 4 using an application launcher.

[ikir]

Faaaaaast 8-)

[JoannaK]

It's easy to amuse Natives .. :-D

[amigamad]

It's easy to amuse Natives

But harder to please amiga owners. :-)

[Wilse]

Looking good so far.

[JoannaK]

Amigamad:
True.. so true ... :-)

[DanDude]

sweet    :-)

[Glames]

Great, great!

Tcho,

Glames

[Piru]

MorphOS 1.4 JIT on 603/240 system is several times faster than the Petunia on 604/180.

c2ptest is over 3.5 times faster, mandel over 2.5, demoeffect over 1.5 times faster.

Remember that CSPPC has twice as fast memory bus, too. The Petunia page describes the A4000 CSPPC test machine to run OS 4.0, so there is no more WarpOS overhead in the results(?).

So does this mean Trance is much faster, or did I miss something?

[hnl_dk]

@ Piru

MorphOS 1.4 JIT on 603/240 system is several times faster than the Petunia on 604/180.

Does MorphOS 1.4 run on anything else than the Pegasos??

If not, then why do you troll?

[HyperionMP]

Just wait until the entire graphics subsystem runs PPC native and then compare again.