we tried to work out a suitable agreement for both parties many, many times -- all directly and all privately.
You really make things sound so complicated but I really don't see the problem. You talk about their terms beeing unrealistic and impossible to work with. Then may I ask you; unless what I'm about to write is untrue, which are the specific details about these terms that are unrealistic and impossible to work with:
1. Any PPC hardware manufacturer or distributor is free to apply for AmigaOS4 support and a license to use the AmigaOne label with their product. AFAIK, Hyperion themselves even applied for a Pegasos but never recieved one.
2. If the ROM issue would be a problem, they have said that just about any alternative solution can be made, such as a USB dongle for example.
I mean, is it really that hard to get AmigaOS4 support for the Pegasos? You know, it's funny how eager you seem to get AmigaDE support for your Pegasos (even trying to sue Amiga Inc. over it) but not AmigaOS4 support. Weren't you supposed to be working for the best interest of the "community"?
Furthermore, are you saying Amiga Inc. didn't offer you (bPlan) the same opportunity to become the official AmigaOS4 developers as Hyperion? Are you saying Amiga Inc. gave Hyperion a better offer than you got? I find it pretty hard to believe.
Now stop this stupid "they are the ones making it difficult to cooperate" attitude because it's bullocks. YOU are the ones making it hard to cooperate, YOU are the ones splitting the community, YOU are the ones parasiticly marketing your products on someone else's brand, YOU are the ones getting one step closer to beeing the reason for the fall of the Amiga market and the community for each day that passes.
Just my not so humble opinion and completely without care wether people find me to be a troll or not...