I'm sure you guys are right, but it has been my experience that (out of the box) CRT's look sharper and more natural than LCD's, whether you're using native modes, video cards or not. Having said that, I have never tweaked the monitor settings to death either. I suspect one would have to play with the pixel clock? or other settings in order to get a decent image out of LCD and an Amiga.
And then there is the widescreen aspect, which really sucks with Amiga. I'm about to purchase a 4:3 LCD for my Amiga, but am already anticipating disappointment compared to my trusty CRT.
First, good thread. I agree with you save2600, the CRTs have much better contrast and color reproduction than LCD. Just look at a web site like tomshardware or Anandtech and one can see the poor color and contract offered by today's monitors.
That said these mass produced things are cheap, $100-130 buys a 2 million pixel monitor.
Anyone have experience getting picasso96, GCX, or native (ECS,AGA) with working wide screen formats, either (854x480, 1280x720, 1366x768, or 1920x1080)? I have seen LCD picasso96 monitor configs and wide screen native drivers out there. Has anyone used them? what are your experiences?
Thanks for the replies. What does PIV stand for? Just curious.
Barney
PIV = Picasso IV
CV64 = Cybervision 64
CD643d = Cybervision 64/3d (not the same as CV64)
PII = Picasso II
PII+ = Picasso II+
These five card make up some of the more common RTG cards out there.
There are more including A2410, GVP Spectrum, Merlin, etc. look at the big book of amiga hardware or amiga hardware database.
Other non zorro RTG cards include CyberVision PPC and BlizzardVision PPC which connect to the cyberstorm ppc and blizzard PPC cards.
Also there are several PCI busboards out there that can handle voodoo 3 (sometimes 4 and 5) S3 virge (dx), and radeon 9200 (9250) PCI based chipsets.