Hi!

[CannonFodder]

mel_zoom wrote:
Hi!

Thanks for that. Im probably not going to spend too much time messing about with it just yet but it is nice to know it still works. When I have more time perhaps I can look at it but there is such a lot still to sort out after moving!

Is this emulator available for OSX/intel?

Why don't you ask Karlos?  You are "colleagues" after all. :roll:

[mel_zoom]

CannonFodder:

Im not sure that would be a very good idea. First of all I have more important things to do at work and secondly I dont think hes much into Macs.

[A4000_Mad]

@ Mel

You got in before me. But I was going to say to CannonFodder that his post didn't come across as being at all friendly. Glad you aren't easily offended :-)


Sorry I can't help with your question. But I'm sure someone will be along before too long who can  :-)


A4000 Mad

[CannonFodder]

mel_zoom wrote:
CannonFodder:

Im not sure that would be a very good idea. First of all I have more important things to do at work and secondly I dont think hes much into Macs.

You will excuse me i hope, if i sounded a little rude.

There have been many trolls on this board before now, so i am unsure of your true identity.

Karlos,

You are an honest bloke who has been here forever.  Is she for real?

[mel_zoom]

CannonFodder:

You did and you still do. Why should I or anybody else here have to provide proof of their identity to you?

[CannonFodder]

mel_zoom wrote:
CannonFodder:

You did and you still do. Why should I or anybody else here have to provide proof of their identity to you?

I was addressing Karlos.

[mel_zoom]

CannonFodder:

Excuse me, I know my posting style might not demonstrate it well but I do write for a living. Only the second half of your post was addressed to him and the rest clearly aimed at me.

[CannonFodder]

mel_zoom wrote:
CannonFodder:

Excuse me, I know my posting style might not demonstrate it well but I do write for a living. Only the second half of your post was addressed to him and the rest clearly aimed at me.

Then you would clearly have noticed that I had finished addressing you on the full-stop preceding the word "Karlos".

Maybe you should take the advice of X-Ray in the Coffee House thread?

[mel_zoom]

CannonFodder:

I did notice. I also noticed that you insisted on questioning my gender, both to me and to him. If you believe Karlos is honest enough then you will see that he has already answered your question earlier.

I never understand why some men - if indeed you are one - feel so threatened by women taking an interest in technical subjects.

[CannonFodder]

mel_zoom wrote:
CannonFodder:

I did notice. I also noticed that you insisted on questioning my gender, both to me and to him. If you believe Karlos is honest enough then you will see that he has already answered your question earlier.

I never understand why some men - if indeed you are one - feel so threatened by women taking an interest in technical subjects.

Because as we all know, women and computers are like men and chocolate.

[mel_zoom]

CannonFodder:

You know, you really shouldnt begin a sentence with "because". Especially when following it with nonsense.

[CannonFodder]

mel_zoom wrote:
CannonFodder:

You know, you really shouldnt begin a sentence with "because". Especially when following it with nonsense.

That is enough to confirm to me that you are indeed a woman.

Only women and gay men are that pedantic about grammar.

You aren't a gay man are you?

[mel_zoom]

CannonFodder:

"You aren't a gay man are you?"

No, but now that weve made up, if you want me to look out for one for you.... :-P

[CannonFodder]

mel_zoom wrote:
CannonFodder:

"You aren't a gay man are you?"

No, but now that weve made up, if you want me to look out for one for you.... :-P

Does this theoretical gay man like to dress in womens clothes?

[mel_zoom]

CannonFodder:

"Does this theoretical gay man like to dress in womens clothes?"

Is that your particular preference? Im not liking your prospects here.

[neon32]

Hahaha


@Cannonfodder

I like chocolate.