0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Vincent wrote:Quotereddwarfer wrote:You lot are so stereotypical :-P I've been called many things but never stereotypical :lol:@nicholasWhat did you teach?
reddwarfer wrote:You lot are so stereotypical :-P
Vincent wrote:Ha bloomin ha :-PWhat subject/class did you teach?
nicholas wrote:Quotereddwarfer wrote:Think what you like matey!There was a programme on television about this controversial debate and it was found that they were no easier than before.We are a growing technological generation, moreso than before and so are better and evolution tells us that things improve slightly through the generations.I'm holding my ground on this issue, we are put under more examinaination pressure than say thirty years ago.Really, the exams kids have today are much easier than they used to be.I no longer teach as I can't stand gobby little herberts who are thick as two short planks and get into college with A grades and are incapable of doing the work needed.
reddwarfer wrote:Think what you like matey!There was a programme on television about this controversial debate and it was found that they were no easier than before.We are a growing technological generation, moreso than before and so are better and evolution tells us that things improve slightly through the generations.I'm holding my ground on this issue, we are put under more examinaination pressure than say thirty years ago.
reddwarfer wrote:Yes, The people capable of getting higher grades in the GCSE's , A levels etc is shown to be able to learn new things as it all comes to show.
nadoom wrote:the results will reflect this, for example more people leave unversity degree courses with lower classifications.Im coming to the conclusion however that university is a load of bollocks, where is my {bleep}ing software engineering job eh??
