Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: What's Better Gfx Card CybervisionPPC or Picasso 4  (Read 5413 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Hyperspeed

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2004
  • Posts: 1749
    • Show only replies by Hyperspeed
Re: What's Better Gfx Card CybervisionPPC or Picasso 4
« Reply #14 on: February 08, 2006, 12:28:26 AM »
If I had the cash I'd get an original Commodore A4000T, Cyberstorm PPC, Picasso-IV with all the expansions, Videotoaster 4000 (what's the flyer for?) and a plasma display of some sort!

:-)



EDIT: As for giving your machines a name, I've just christened my A1200 desktop 'Quasimodo' because the 1260 has warped the trapdoor cover and it's had 12 years of wear & tear. A few of the letters on the keyboard are now invisible and I have to rely on The Force to guide me.

:-D
 

Offline Argus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2004
  • Posts: 942
    • Show only replies by Argus
Re: What's Better Gfx Card CybervisionPPC or Picasso 4
« Reply #15 on: February 08, 2006, 12:48:35 AM »
Quote

Hyperspeed wrote:
If I had the cash I'd get an original Commodore A4000T, Cyberstorm PPC, Picasso-IV with all the expansions, Videotoaster 4000 (what's the flyer for?) and a plasma display of some sort!
:-D


Agreed, a PIV and a CybervisionPPC in the same A4000 would be nice.  Mine has a PIV and Prometheus pci w/ Voodoo3 pci card using an adaptor I got off redrumloa.

The Newtek Flyer is a non-linear direct to disk video audio editing board that fits in a ZII Amiga slot.  It has three scsi 2 controllers using a custom file and video format (VTASC) to record direct to disk video (2 controllers) and direct to disk audio (1 scsi controller).  You can use up to 21 scsi drives on it, iirc, at rates ~6MB/s, so you usually see a scsi tower next to a Toaster/Flyer-equipped A4000D/A4000T.  The Flyer connects via ribbon cable to the Video Toaster4000 and allows direct recording and manipulation of video from the Toaster without using tapes or external recording devices.  The only so-called 'problem' with the Flyer is that video output is composite, rather than split rgb but that much balleyhooed fault is due more prejudice in the video community due to the poor composite quality of VHS.  The Flyer's composite output is actually much better.  Anyway, for the money, it still can do an awful lot of stuff and was way ahead of it's time when it came out.  Worth fooling around with if you can find a VT4000/Flyer setup.
posted on A2500+ C=2620 14MHz/8MbFast/1MbChip
dialed in @34K
Just livin\\\' the dream...
 

Offline Hyperspeed

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2004
  • Posts: 1749
    • Show only replies by Hyperspeed
Re: What's Better Gfx Card CybervisionPPC or Picasso 4
« Reply #16 on: February 08, 2006, 03:14:39 AM »
Ahhh, so that's what I've seen here:
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=8760237937

Seems daft having such a large tower and then having to get a seperate SCSI tower. Better if Commodore had cut those 2x useless vertical drive bays out and given 3 or 4 SCSI caddies instead.

Composite is pretty crappy for broadcast isn't it? No wonder a lot of American news/weather shows look grainy and washed out.

:-D
 

Offline justthatgood

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2003
  • Posts: 579
  • Country: us
    • Show only replies by justthatgood
Re: What's Better Gfx Card CybervisionPPC or Picasso 4
« Reply #17 on: February 08, 2006, 03:43:24 AM »
Hyperspeed.  Whether they have those two drive bays or not, I would still get that tower.

I mean that tower setup is in so much better shape then this one

http://cgi.ebay.com/Amiga-4000-Tower-with-Toaster-4000-and-Flyer-and-TBC4_W0QQitemZ8762872945QQcategoryZ4598QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem">
Right here

Don't you think. I think so.  I mean I would still get them if I had the money to , just because I would like a setup like that.  
[color=008000]Pluto[/color]:Amiga4KD- 64040/16megs/1GB WD/PAR 2150/1942/WB3.0,3.1,3.9
[color=800080]Amanda[/color]:Amiga2KHD/A2620/8MegSupraRam2k/A2091/VLab
 

Offline Hyperspeed

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2004
  • Posts: 1749
    • Show only replies by Hyperspeed
Re: What's Better Gfx Card CybervisionPPC or Picasso 4
« Reply #18 on: February 08, 2006, 04:25:14 AM »
Some Amigas are just skank.

Yeah, I'd prefer the classic Commodore A4000T but what do you put in those two vertical bays. The machine is wide enough to have accomodated two internal 3.5" drives or two 5.25" drives horizontally.

And you can't mount a CD drive upwards unless you have a slot loader!

I don't know how useful a Toaster/Flyer would be in Europe since it's NTSC only but if there were utilities to convert the end result to MPG you could burn to a VCD/DVD I suppose.
 

Offline Argus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2004
  • Posts: 942
    • Show only replies by Argus
Re: What's Better Gfx Card CybervisionPPC or Picasso 4
« Reply #19 on: February 08, 2006, 11:50:35 AM »
The main reason for having a separate tower for the scsi drives is heat and power.  Some of these Flyer setups have several large capacity scsi drives for each of the three controllers; that's a lot of juice and heat generated.  You want to keep all that away from your rather delicate pcb's in the computer tower, if you can.
posted on A2500+ C=2620 14MHz/8MbFast/1MbChip
dialed in @34K
Just livin\\\' the dream...
 

Offline justthatgood

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2003
  • Posts: 579
  • Country: us
    • Show only replies by justthatgood
Re: What's Better Gfx Card CybervisionPPC or Picasso 4
« Reply #20 on: February 08, 2006, 01:51:15 PM »
Yeah that's what I was thinking. I know exactly how dangerous SCSI drives can be and I know how much those juice those things suck up when they start up. I'm pretty sure that the engineers of Amiga didn't envision the day that video cards would have to have their own power substation to get started, so I'm sure the Amiga motherboard isn't invincible.

Besides starving the motherboard and cards of power from the already strained power supply, I would think all the drives, the cables to connect them all, the brackets to hold them in place, and the fans to cool all that would make for a very crowded house in a 4000T.  Hey, you could get all fancy by having all your stuff in hot swap trays. :idea:
[color=008000]Pluto[/color]:Amiga4KD- 64040/16megs/1GB WD/PAR 2150/1942/WB3.0,3.1,3.9
[color=800080]Amanda[/color]:Amiga2KHD/A2620/8MegSupraRam2k/A2091/VLab
 

Offline tonyvdb

Re: What's Better Gfx Card CybervisionPPC or Picasso 4
« Reply #21 on: February 08, 2006, 04:29:11 PM »
If you have a look here I have a photo of my home setup. If you look at the top right side you will see that I have an A4000D that I have the Video Toaster 4000 and Flyer system installed with CyberstormPPC. I have all my TBC's and Flyer drives installed in the Tower case just beside the A4000 I have 2 Cheetah 36gig and 4 9gig drives on the two SCSI video devices and one Barracudah 4.5gig drive for audio. I had to install 3 fans in the desktop and there are 6 fans in the Tower to keep things nice and cool.

The composit output of the Flyer is actualy very good at 480 lines D2 quality. You can get an add on card that will give you an S-video out that boost it to 525 lines. (remeber that DVD's are only 480 lines) so as long as your recording device is digital your getting a great poduct like me I record straight to my PC and make DVDs out of it.
Amiga 2000HD Indivision ECS
Amiga 4000D towerised OS 3.1 and 3.9 on CF cards
Indivision AGA, Mediator 4000
Video Toaster 4000 Flyer v4.3 Millenium.
202gig of video drive space & 5gig audio.
 

Offline Hyperspeed

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2004
  • Posts: 1749
    • Show only replies by Hyperspeed
Re: What's Better Gfx Card CybervisionPPC or Picasso 4
« Reply #22 on: February 09, 2006, 04:38:57 AM »
What commercials/broadcasts/shows/movies used the Videotoaster? All that springs to mind is Babylon 5, Seaquest DSV and the Robocop TV series.

I heard somewhere Jurassic Park/T2 used it... or was this more Lightwave? I don't get how Lightwave utilises it...
 

Offline Hyperspeed

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2004
  • Posts: 1749
    • Show only replies by Hyperspeed
Re: What's Better Gfx Card CybervisionPPC or Picasso 4
« Reply #23 on: February 09, 2006, 04:40:30 AM »
Here's a box for Toaster drives:

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=8762046071

Would make a nice SCSI tower for A1200 owners I suppose...
 

Offline Piru

  • \' union select name,pwd--
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 6946
    • Show only replies by Piru
    • http://www.iki.fi/sintonen/
Re: What's Better Gfx Card CybervisionPPC or Picasso 4
« Reply #24 on: February 09, 2006, 05:12:10 AM »
You can use Picasso 4 with MorphOS 1.4.5 aswell.

http://v4.cybergraphx.de/

Quote
CGX4 4.3 rc6 Update

This update will allow CyberGraphX4 owners to use CVision3D/CVision64/PicassoIV
drivers with MorphOS on dual boot setups.
Above cards have been successfully tested with PowerUp MorphOS1.4.5 and A4000T/CSPPC,
other drivers might work as well.
 

Offline TjLaZer

Re: What's Better Gfx Card CybervisionPPC or Picasso 4
« Reply #25 on: February 09, 2006, 05:13:12 AM »
Whats better a Nissan 300ZX Twin Turbo or a Nissan Senta?  :P
Going Bananas over AMIGAs since 1987...

Looking for Fusion Fourty PNG ROMs V3.4?

:flame: :banana: :banana: :banana:
 

Offline justthatgood

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2003
  • Posts: 579
  • Country: us
    • Show only replies by justthatgood
Re: What's Better Gfx Card CybervisionPPC or Picasso 4
« Reply #26 on: February 09, 2006, 05:24:01 AM »
@TjLaZer

A Ferrari Enzo  :-P
[color=008000]Pluto[/color]:Amiga4KD- 64040/16megs/1GB WD/PAR 2150/1942/WB3.0,3.1,3.9
[color=800080]Amanda[/color]:Amiga2KHD/A2620/8MegSupraRam2k/A2091/VLab
 

Offline Lockon_15

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2006
  • Posts: 304
    • Show only replies by Lockon_15
Re: What's Better Gfx Card CybervisionPPC or Picasso 4
« Reply #27 on: February 09, 2006, 10:54:33 AM »
Can I use Picasso 4 SD/FF to display OCS modes (15,6Khz) right from boot? I mean, is SD/FF module independent of RTG's driver so it feed from Denise directly?

I have OCS A2000 (KS 1.3, OS 1.3).
A500+/KS3.1/GVPA530/2MbChipRam+8MbFastRAM 2GbCF/YAMAHA CDRW
 

Offline Argus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2004
  • Posts: 942
    • Show only replies by Argus
Re: What's Better Gfx Card CybervisionPPC or Picasso 4
« Reply #28 on: February 09, 2006, 11:39:15 AM »
I reckon so, but you need to either break off the ff/sd portion of the PIV to mount in the A2000's video slot or get some kind of adaptor board to put a video slot in-line with a ZII slot.  You're better off with a C= A2320 or Microway FF/SD in the A2000 video slot.  
posted on A2500+ C=2620 14MHz/8MbFast/1MbChip
dialed in @34K
Just livin\\\' the dream...
 

Offline Lockon_15

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2006
  • Posts: 304
    • Show only replies by Lockon_15
Re: What's Better Gfx Card CybervisionPPC or Picasso 4
« Reply #29 from previous page: February 09, 2006, 02:02:40 PM »
Thnx for reply.

This is what I have found about P4 SD/FF part of Picasso IV:

Quote from www.amiga-hardware.com

"If the Picasso IV is intended for use in an A2000, the flicker fixer can actually be "snapped" from the card and joined to it by a ribbon cable. This is because the A2000 does not have an inline video slot, like other models".

Perhaps this could actually work just as you said...
A500+/KS3.1/GVPA530/2MbChipRam+8MbFastRAM 2GbCF/YAMAHA CDRW