Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Amiga Kit Amiga Store Iridium Banner AMIStore App Store A600 Memory

AuthorTopic: Escom new Amigas  (Read 1735 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Narayan

Escom new Amigas
« on: September 14, 2005, 10:19:58 PM »
If anyone feels they are touched by the title they should know that I feel that all then new Escom Amigas were very generic at the time.

 :madashell:
 

Offline kd7ota

Re: Escom new Amigas
« Reply #1 on: September 14, 2005, 11:16:13 PM »
....Meh, wouldn't mind having one.
-=-=-=-=-=-
Mine!  :-D
 

Offline kd7ota

Re: Escom new Amigas
« Reply #2 on: September 14, 2005, 11:18:01 PM »
On second note....

Is it just me, or does this guy have a striking features as someone else who was obsessed about some high grade stuff... :-?
-=-=-=-=-=-
Mine!  :-D
 

Offline billchase

Re: Escom new Amigas
« Reply #3 on: September 14, 2005, 11:26:13 PM »
Too early to tell if he is our "favorite" forum member of all
time.  Right now I am going to say no.

C Snyder
 

Offline adolescent

Re: Escom new Amigas
« Reply #4 on: September 15, 2005, 06:21:11 AM »
I don't think so either.  But, then again I've yet to understand a thing he's said.
Time to move on.  Bye Amiga.org.  :(
 

Offline Martyn

Re: Escom new Amigas
« Reply #5 on: September 15, 2005, 02:04:10 PM »

Nah, he's just a generic poster...

1
2
3
4
If you put water into a cup, it becomes the cup. You put water into a bottle and it becomes the bottle. You put it in a teapot it becomes the teapot.
Now, water can flow or it can crash. Be water my friend. -- Bruce Lee
 

Offline bloodline

  • Master Sock Abuser
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 12113
  • Total likes: 0
    • http://www.troubled-mind.com
Re: Escom new Amigas
« Reply #6 on: September 15, 2005, 02:09:51 PM »
Quote

Martyn wrote:

Nah, he's just a generic poster...

1
2
3
4


Gah!!! That was a lot of work just to sut up a simple gag... :-/

Offline Framiga

Re: Escom new Amigas
« Reply #7 on: September 15, 2005, 03:13:31 PM »
. . . very generic!

 

  • Guest
Re: Escom new Amigas
« Reply #8 on: September 15, 2005, 03:23:17 PM »
Quote

billchase wrote:
Too early to tell if he is our "favorite" forum member of all
time.  Right now I am going to say no.

C Snyder


cuamiga/jonopike/sumner/teddanson perhaps?
 

Offline NedKelly

Re: Escom new Amigas
« Reply #9 on: September 15, 2005, 03:26:08 PM »
Quote

Martyn wrote:

Nah, he's just a generic poster...

1
2
3
4


That's funny.  :lol:  A generic poster.

..what I'm wondering is the point of the post? Posters' usually ask questions not make another generic comment.  :-(
 

Offline MrZammler

Re: Escom new Amigas
« Reply #10 on: September 15, 2005, 03:29:49 PM »
Damn, he made it to a.org...

This guy spams csam usenet group quite often. (Actually, nowdays your most likely to see one of his posts than anything else). Another username he uses is ive.
Anyway is the only way
 

Offline Narayan

Re: Escom new Amigas
« Reply #11 on: September 15, 2005, 03:44:19 PM »
Quote

MrZammler wrote:
Damn, he made it to a.org...

This guy spams csam usenet group quite often. (Actually, nowdays your most likely to see one of his posts than anything else). Another username he uses is ive.


If I wasn't almost genericly deabused just now I'd write your name here.

Furthermore, although not thematic, but this one got me here, he's calling my name, and I can't call his. Very generic, to say the least.
 

Offline howiehowie

Re: Escom new Amigas
« Reply #12 on: September 15, 2005, 03:56:48 PM »
Hmmmm.... That sounds very SPECIFIC to me!   :-D
\\"A little madness, now and then, is relished by the wisest men\\"
 

Offline kd7ota

Re: Escom new Amigas
« Reply #13 on: September 15, 2005, 04:28:04 PM »
So was I right about it being our favorite forum poster?  :-D
-=-=-=-=-=-
Mine!  :-D
 

Offline Narayan

Re: Escom new Amigas
« Reply #14 on: September 15, 2005, 05:36:56 PM »
Quote

kd7ota wrote:
So was I right about it being our favorite forum poster?  :-D


I've pressed reply and now gonna write the reply.

Why, thank you kindly, I believe you are right. I _am_ reading almost everything else and best to my perception as well as my comprehension (which is almost generic, or not generic at all) I'd say I am really the only one stating himself here, or has a few letters extra for the right impression.

And - furthermore and of no less importance - I'm not - /that/ - generic.