Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Forums
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: A3000 UX / A3000 ?  (Read 3385 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline danamania

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Jan 2003
  • Posts: 84
    • Show only replies by danamania
    • http://www.danaquarium.com/
Re: A3000 UX / A3000 ?
« Reply #14 from previous page: June 03, 2005, 03:34:23 AM »
Very similar was A/UX, only for 68k Macs. I think Apple continued development for it up until around 1996/97.

http://www.applefritter.com/ui/aux/index.html has a little walkthrough. It ran on some of the 68020 to 68040 boxes from the late 80s/early 90s.

dana
Logged
 

Offline terminator

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Join Date: Nov 2003
  • Posts: 29
    • Show only replies by terminator
    • http://valleynet.on.ca/~michael
Re: A3000 UX / A3000 ?
« Reply #15 on: June 04, 2005, 01:20:37 AM »
There is only one UNIX, and Commodore licensed UNIX from AT&T for the purpose of creating a version for the Amiga.

IRC, no one else had ever licenced UNIX for a personal computer.

And the Amiga version was System V.
Logged
 

Offline SyrTran

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: May 2003
  • Posts: 101
  • Country: 00
    • Show only replies by SyrTran
Re: A3000 UX / A3000 ?
« Reply #16 on: June 04, 2005, 02:53:24 AM »
Santa Cruz Operation's SCO/Unix, which was previously known as M$' Xenix, was a fully licensed AT&T Unix for X86.  I believe it was System III.  It predates the 3000.  Hell, under M$, it predated the C64.
Logged
Tony T.

People who generalize are always wrong.
;-)
 
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »