Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?  (Read 7826 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SyrTran

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: May 2003
  • Posts: 101
  • Country: 00
    • Show only replies by SyrTran
Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
« Reply #29 from previous page: February 25, 2005, 03:14:34 AM »
@CU_AMiGA

Quote
By failed consoles i mean:

Panasonic 3DO
Philips CDi
Sharp X68000
Sinclair Quantum Leap
Atari 5200
Atari Lynx
Sega Nomad
GP32
Sam Coupé


The Atari 5200 wasn't a failure.  At the time (early 80's) it was -the- console to get.  It only died because Warner Communication (now Time-Warner) decided to get out of home electronics.

Quote
....etc - The list goes on!!!

to the Atari 7800 and Jaguar, the Sega FX-32 (I dunno, that wasn't really a console, was it?) and Saturn, and let's not forget Nuon-based DVD players.

Being the owner of 3 Jags, I think I'd have to vote for the Dreamcast (I've never owned one).  It was the console with the most fans and the fewest games.

I'd vote for the Jag, but it wasn't successful enough to be a failure. :-D
Tony T.

People who generalize are always wrong.
;-)
 

  • Guest
Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
« Reply #30 on: February 25, 2005, 01:35:06 PM »
Quote
Getting old sucks


You can say that again! :-D
 

Offline Speelgoedmannetje

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2002
  • Posts: 9656
    • Show only replies by Speelgoedmannetje
Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
« Reply #31 on: February 25, 2005, 02:03:01 PM »
After playing a couple of hours quake 3 with the dc controller I got indeed a bit of cramp in my hands.
Considering the vmu? Well, there's always cello/duct tape! :-D
And the canary said: \'chirp\'
 

Offline seer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 1453
    • Show only replies by seer
Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
« Reply #32 on: February 25, 2005, 06:00:30 PM »
What about systems like TurboGrafx and TurboDuo? Those were huge successes in Japan, however failed in N. America.

Failed ? I thought the "Turbo" consoles were just never marketed outside of Japan ? They seemed rather popular with imports
~
Everything you say will be misquoted and used against you.
~
 

Offline SamuraiCrow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 2281
  • Country: us
  • Gender: Male
    • Show only replies by SamuraiCrow
Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
« Reply #33 on: February 25, 2005, 07:05:44 PM »
I remember the TurboGrafx 16 being sold in WalMart at about the time the SuperNES came out.  It was a bit weak with only an 8-bit processor when compared with the 65816 of the SNES and the 68000 of the Sega Genesis.
 

Offline bloodline

  • Master Sock Abuser
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 12114
    • Show only replies by bloodline
    • http://www.troubled-mind.com
Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
« Reply #34 on: February 25, 2005, 08:01:41 PM »
What is a VMU?

  • Guest
Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
« Reply #35 on: February 25, 2005, 08:16:57 PM »
Quote

bloodline wrote:
What is a VMU?


Something a pot of live yoghurt and a week long course of antibiotics gets rid of usually! ;-)
 

Offline CU_AMiGATopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2003
  • Posts: 1807
    • Show only replies by CU_AMiGA
Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
« Reply #36 on: February 26, 2005, 03:07:14 PM »
Quote

mdma wrote:
Anyone got a GP32 BLU?

I'm thinking of getting one, because of all the different emulators you can get for it, even the Playstation! :-o

I haven't seen any evidence of a UAE port to it yet though.


Hey Yo!

I have a GP32 FLU. Bloody good machines they are. Mega Drive emaultion and SNES are gob smacking :shock:

Regards
A1200D / AGA / B1260 / 64MB RAM / KS 3.1 / AOS 3.9 / 4GB HD
 

  • Guest
Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
« Reply #37 on: February 27, 2005, 01:10:32 PM »
Quote

CU_AMiGA wrote:
Quote

mdma wrote:
Anyone got a GP32 BLU?

I'm thinking of getting one, because of all the different emulators you can get for it, even the Playstation! :-o

I haven't seen any evidence of a UAE port to it yet though.


Hey Yo!

I have a GP32 FLU. Bloody good machines they are. Mega Drive emaultion and SNES are gob smacking :shock:

Regards


Whats the difference between the FLU and the BLU versions?
 

Offline that_punk_guy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 4526
    • Show only replies by that_punk_guy
Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
« Reply #38 on: February 27, 2005, 06:41:22 PM »
Hey Yo!

I... Sorry, I just wanted to be cool. :-D
 

Offline Speelgoedmannetje

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2002
  • Posts: 9656
    • Show only replies by Speelgoedmannetje
Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
« Reply #39 on: February 27, 2005, 07:15:59 PM »
Quote

bloodline wrote:
What is a VMU?
The 'Visual Memory Unit' of the sega Dreamcast (sold seperately)
And the canary said: \'chirp\'
 

Offline CU_AMiGATopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2003
  • Posts: 1807
    • Show only replies by CU_AMiGA
Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
« Reply #40 on: February 27, 2005, 08:42:43 PM »
Quote

mdma wrote:
Quote

CU_AMiGA wrote:
Quote

mdma wrote:
Anyone got a GP32 BLU?

I'm thinking of getting one, because of all the different emulators you can get for it, even the Playstation! :-o

I haven't seen any evidence of a UAE port to it yet though.


Hey Yo!

I have a GP32 FLU. Bloody good machines they are. Mega Drive emaultion and SNES are gob smacking :shock:

Regards


Whats the difference between the FLU and the BLU versions?


Hey Yo!

The FLU stands for "Front Lit Unit" (which has a front light on the screen similar to GBA SP) and BLU stands for "Back                                  Lit Unit" (which is similar to the back lit handhelds like Game Gear Atari Lynx). I hope this helps

Regards,
A1200D / AGA / B1260 / 64MB RAM / KS 3.1 / AOS 3.9 / 4GB HD
 

Offline Speelgoedmannetje

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2002
  • Posts: 9656
    • Show only replies by Speelgoedmannetje
Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
« Reply #41 on: February 27, 2005, 08:46:37 PM »
considering the multimedia abilities of the GP32 I'm quite sceptical.
Unless an usb stick can be used on the usb port (or an external cd-r/dvd combo),
'cuz these smart media cards seem not to be that common nowadays and 128 mb seems to be the maximum
also a pity there's no touch screen, if there was, you really could replace yer palmtop with it

maybe time for a gp128? :-)
And the canary said: \'chirp\'
 

Offline CU_AMiGATopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2003
  • Posts: 1807
    • Show only replies by CU_AMiGA
Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
« Reply #42 on: February 27, 2005, 08:55:10 PM »
@Speel

Did you have any trouble with the connector for the power supply on the Atari Lynx. My old one came loose and broke. And my newer one is coming a little loose, but am having it repaired and made more stable.

Regards,
A1200D / AGA / B1260 / 64MB RAM / KS 3.1 / AOS 3.9 / 4GB HD
 

Offline Speelgoedmannetje

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2002
  • Posts: 9656
    • Show only replies by Speelgoedmannetje
Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
« Reply #43 on: February 27, 2005, 08:56:37 PM »
never had any troubles with that :-?
(btw, I got a lynx 2)
And the canary said: \'chirp\'
 

  • Guest
Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
« Reply #44 on: February 27, 2005, 10:37:53 PM »
Quote

CU_AMiGA wrote:
@Speel

Did you have any trouble with the connector for the power supply on the Atari Lynx. My old one came loose and broke. And my newer one is coming a little loose, but am having it repaired and made more stable.

Regards,


I never had trouble with my Lynx.  It was built like a Volvo! :-D