Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Horatio: G4 Patient Simulator  (Read 1113 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline asian1Topic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 1359
    • Show only replies by asian1
Horatio: G4 Patient Simulator
« on: May 23, 2004, 06:12:38 AM »
Horatio

Hi
Horatio is a mannequin / patient simulator machine, controlled by G4 (Apple PowerMac) with Mac OS X.
Perhaps in the future it will be possible to create similar machine, but with Micro AmigaOne inside the mannequin and wifi for controlling the machine.

If this device is possible, who is the best model for Mannequin, is it Jay Miner (RIP), Gary Hare, Gary Peake (heart attack), Bill McEwen or someone else? :)
 

Offline weirdami

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2003
  • Posts: 3776
    • Show only replies by weirdami
    • Http://Bindingpolymer.com
Re: Horatio: G4 Patient Simulator
« Reply #1 on: May 23, 2004, 09:23:19 AM »
How about Resusci Amiga?
----
Binding Polymer: Keeping you together since 1892.
 

Offline Floid

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2003
  • Posts: 918
    • Show only replies by Floid
Re: Horatio: G4 Patient Simulator
« Reply #2 on: May 23, 2004, 10:05:23 AM »
Well, the fact is that "he's" basically a USB, Firewire, or WiFi peripheral as it stands.  I sincerely doubt they need all the power of the G4, though (sounds like it's mostly an expert system, doing lookups, or in fact driven by an expert), and while the real expense is in the mannequin itself, then sure, putting more of the 'brains' (pardon the pun) inside and making it manageable from a WiFi* laptop would be a small improvement if there's ever to be a 'production model' to drag around and train people in other settings with.

*I'd bet WiFi is not-so-good an idea here, because hospitals are already cluttered with wireless of various forms as it is, possibly including wlans and the like.  Something like Bluetooth or the upcoming WUSB might be a better pick, since there's really never going to be a need to operate the dummy from more than 20 feet away.  (My understanding is that Bluetooth might also be a bit more transparently 'tolerant' of band crowding, versus requiring manual channel-selection... but I've never used an actual Bluetooth or 802.11 device.)

Hey, sure, it's a joke, but an engineer somewhere has to tackle these problems... wonder if they went with the Mac for any particular reason, or just because it makes a fairly stable platform for Flash or whatever they wrote the interface in?