> Your message brings up a valid question. You talk about coding for
> the PET. Considering WIndows has a 95% hold on the market, and
> MacOS has the other 5%, I wonder if non-standard computers and
> operating systems would wind up being banned in the end.
I was reading about this bill last year, when it was called the SSSCA. I haven't followed it for a while so I'm not sure what changed, besides the name.
IIRC, there is a cutoff date involved as to the manufacture of the hardware, which would almost certainly render the PET exempt. That was one of the main arguments against the bill...that if it was passed, people would stop buying new computer hardware, new CD players, DVD-players, etc. If you think a 9-year-old Amiga 1200 has no more life in it, just wait until this bill passes!
Where this law really crosses the line is with open-source software, which it would almost certainly render illegal. Since the source code is always available and there's no way to insure that it's always compiled with the copy-protection code intact, I don't see another alternative. :-(
I believe that voting this bill down isn't enough. Senator Hollings must be run out of office, then tarred-and-feathered (or perhaps the other way around ;-) for his "kindly" actions on behalf of the American people. Only then do we stand a chance of of preventing another lapdog from taking his place.
Todd