Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: What is Status of COLDFIRE PROJECT?  (Read 5796 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Oli_hd

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2002
  • Posts: 912
    • Show only replies by Oli_hd
Re: What is Status of COLDFIRE PROJECT?
« Reply #14 from previous page: September 05, 2003, 03:55:34 PM »
Hi,

Quote
erm . .you wiil go to Benelux with a "working" card?

Depends what the card is doing at that time, if I can get the card working then yes, if not then no, as it stands.. no it wont be working.  :-D
Even if it was working I would have second thoughts about taking it fitted in an A4000 to show it working.

Quote
Isn't your project started with the name of " AmigaColdfire Project"?


Well it doesnt really have a name, even now, so you will find lots of names with the words Amiga,  Coldfire and project, the Yahoo group (groups.yahoo.com/group/amigacoldfire) is just called Amigacoldfire, it wasnt ever ment to be the final name and the current name ("ColdFusion Accelerator") isnt fixed either, however I can why you thought what you did.
 

Offline whabang

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 7270
    • Show only replies by whabang
Re: What is Status of COLDFIRE PROJECT?
« Reply #15 on: September 05, 2003, 04:52:40 PM »
This project gave me an idea:
Would it be possible to design a palin PCB with nothing but sockets on it? Technically, yes, I know, but how about an Amiga ATX mobo with sockets for all custom chips etc. present? Or would that be an infringement on the original patents?
Beating the dead horse since 2002.
 

Offline Atheist

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 820
    • Show only replies by Atheist
Re: What is Status of COLDFIRE PROJECT?
« Reply #16 on: September 05, 2003, 11:19:18 PM »
I can't wait to see this a success. That'll make all of the old models of Amiga competitive for another 10 years against pc xps!!!!!!!!!  :-o  :-D


AmigaOne! Never has a competitor come from so far behind to pass the giant!!!!!  :-D
\\"Which would you buy? The Crappy A1200, 15 years out of date... or the Mobile Phone that I have?\\" -- bloodline
So I guess that A500, 600, 1000, 2000, CDTV, CD32, are pure garbage then? Thanks for posting here.
 

Offline Karlos

  • Sockologist
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 16882
  • Country: gb
  • Thanked: 6 times
    • Show only replies by Karlos
Re: What is Status of COLDFIRE PROJECT?
« Reply #17 on: September 06, 2003, 01:18:09 PM »
@Oliver

I call first dibs on a working prototype card for the 1200 :-)
int p; // A
 

Offline Kronos

  • Resident blue troll
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 4017
    • Show only replies by Kronos
    • http://www.SteamDraw.de
Re: What is Status of COLDFIRE PROJECT?
« Reply #18 on: September 06, 2003, 01:27:31 PM »
@whabang

The orginal long-term-grand-plan was targeted towards a complete replacement-board
with the chips redone in some programmable logik (like the C-One).

Wether that stills stands, or if it is realistic at al ....
1. Make an announcment.
2. Wait a while.
3. Check if it can actually be done.
4. Wait for someone else to do it.
5. Start working on it while giving out hillarious progress-reports.
6. Deny that you have ever announced it
7. Blame someone else
 

Offline Dr_Righteous

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 1345
    • Show only replies by Dr_Righteous
Re: What is Status of COLDFIRE PROJECT?
« Reply #19 on: September 06, 2003, 02:12:11 PM »
@whabang

As a personal pet project I have been fiddling around with such a design. While still in block-diagram design at the moment, I am making some progress. It's one of those things that's constantly on my mind, so I keep playing with it.

It's two designs really... One incorporating the original chipset, one completely overhauled to updated hardware. QuickLogic has some really nice chips that work well with 680x0 processors... Mainly an SDRAM controller and a PCI controller... From there the possibilities are endless!

The real nightmare will be in getting OS3.x to run on the updated board. It'll have to involve patching kickstart before boot (using a flashrom and nvram), and using a customized installer to install WB including the necessary drivers. This will also get around the legalities of distributing a modified version of OS3.x, since it works like an emulator (using what you already own)  :-D
- Doc

A4000D, A3640 OC-36.3MHz, custom tower, Mediator A4000D. Diamond Banshee 16M, Indivision AGA 4000, GVP HC+8.

Mac Mini 1.5GHz, that might run MorphOS someday, when the fools who own it come to the realization that 30 minutes just isn\'t enough time to play with it enough to decide whether or not you like it enough to cough up $200.

 - Someone please design SOME kind of DIY accelerator for the A4000. :D -
 

Offline whabang

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 7270
    • Show only replies by whabang
Re: What is Status of COLDFIRE PROJECT?
« Reply #20 on: September 06, 2003, 03:36:59 PM »
@DrRighteous
Cool! An ATX mobo and a CF-accelerator would make a fun combination to play around with... :-D
Beating the dead horse since 2002.
 

Offline Dr_Righteous

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 1345
    • Show only replies by Dr_Righteous
Re: What is Status of COLDFIRE PROJECT?
« Reply #21 on: September 07, 2003, 09:28:30 AM »
@whabang

Well at the moment I'm sticking to the 060... But if I can get that far, I don't see any trouble getting a CF board to work, since I intend to incorporate an A1200 style expansion connector  :-D
- Doc

A4000D, A3640 OC-36.3MHz, custom tower, Mediator A4000D. Diamond Banshee 16M, Indivision AGA 4000, GVP HC+8.

Mac Mini 1.5GHz, that might run MorphOS someday, when the fools who own it come to the realization that 30 minutes just isn\'t enough time to play with it enough to decide whether or not you like it enough to cough up $200.

 - Someone please design SOME kind of DIY accelerator for the A4000. :D -
 

Offline Fedorenko

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Join Date: Sep 2003
  • Posts: 11
    • Show only replies by Fedorenko
Re: What is Status of COLDFIRE PROJECT?
« Reply #22 on: September 08, 2003, 11:30:41 AM »
This is a bit OT and stupid,  but anyway:

Is the Coldfire kinda compatable with the 680x0 processor line?
 

Offline Karlos

  • Sockologist
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 16882
  • Country: gb
  • Thanked: 6 times
    • Show only replies by Karlos
Re: What is Status of COLDFIRE PROJECT?
« Reply #23 on: September 08, 2003, 01:01:44 PM »
Quote

Fedorenko wrote:
Is the Coldfire kinda compatable with the 680x0 processor line?


Yes, it's pretty much what the (discontinued) 680x0 evolved into. It has the same user model as the 68k (almost) but has been extensively optimised for higher performance in embedded systems.

On the downside, as an 'upgrade' for an existing 680x0 system it is quite tricky. Firstly, the supervisor model is pretty different but more importantly it lacks some addressimg modes (IIRC) and opcodes in common use in much 680x0 code. Such missing features would need to be emulated one way or another.

Mind you, most 040/060 systems have to do that anyway, especially for 68881 code, so it's not as if it's impossible. I reckon a coldfire version of an 'OxyPatcher' style tool could address the majority of missing functionality.

Im not sure but the missing address modes may have been put pack in later coldfire cores.

Anyhow, I'm sure Oli know's what he's doing and I'm really looking forward to seeing a working prototype :-)
int p; // A
 

Offline Dr_Righteous

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 1345
    • Show only replies by Dr_Righteous
Re: What is Status of COLDFIRE PROJECT?
« Reply #24 on: September 08, 2003, 07:07:05 PM »
Just to kinda restate what Karlos said... Motorola has created code to set the v4+ ColdFire processor into a 680x0 compatability mode. The idea behind the "ColdFusion" accelerator is to load this code from a ROM before Kickstart and the rest of the system loads... Thus turning the ColdFire into a 680x0 cpu upgrade on steroids!  :-D

Based on some polling data collected, some other nicities will be added to the accelerator, like USB and such... Having direct access to the CPU local bus will make these add-ons much faster than anything connected to the Zorro bus.

I've followed this project pretty closely since the begining, since I myself had the same idea back when the v3 CF came out... But of course that chip seriously lacked 680x0 compatability.

What can I say? I'm a 680x0 junkie!
- Doc

A4000D, A3640 OC-36.3MHz, custom tower, Mediator A4000D. Diamond Banshee 16M, Indivision AGA 4000, GVP HC+8.

Mac Mini 1.5GHz, that might run MorphOS someday, when the fools who own it come to the realization that 30 minutes just isn\'t enough time to play with it enough to decide whether or not you like it enough to cough up $200.

 - Someone please design SOME kind of DIY accelerator for the A4000. :D -