Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Forums
« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Kikstart 2.04 vs. 2.05 on an A500...  (Read 1319 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline trip6Topic starter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2007
  • Posts: 348
    • Show only replies by trip6
Kikstart 2.04 vs. 2.05 on an A500...
« on: September 24, 2007, 07:11:09 PM »
Are there any advantages\disadvantages to running Kikstart 2.05 on an A500 over kikstart 2.04?

I have both KikRoms just wondering which is better to use?

Thanks in advance.
Logged
 

Offline BinoX

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2005
  • Posts: 454
    • Show only replies by BinoX
Re: Kikstart 2.04 vs. 2.05 on an A500...
« Reply #1 on: September 24, 2007, 07:15:46 PM »
I think the only difference (and correct me if I'm wrong)

Is that the 2.05 version has the A600s IDE device driver in it and the 2.04 doesn't..
Logged
Back to action!
 

Offline motrucker

Re: Kikstart 2.04 vs. 2.05 on an A500...
« Reply #2 on: September 25, 2007, 04:34:57 AM »
There are a few additions to 2.05, that the A500 can't use - so it really makes no difference. Some ide info, PCMCIA support...
I've got a 2.05 ROM in an A500, only because I couldn't find a 2.04 back then. It seems to work OK.....
Logged
A2000 GVP 40MHz \'030, 21Mb RAM SD/FF, 2 floppies, internal CD-ROM drive, micromys v3 w/laser mouse
A1000 Microbotics Starboard II w/2Mb 1080, & external floppy (AIRdrive)
C-128 w/1571, 1750, & Final Cartridge III+
 

Offline Jope

Re: Kikstart 2.04 vs. 2.05 on an A500...
« Reply #3 on: September 25, 2007, 05:26:28 AM »
If you build an A600/1200 compatible IDE port into the A500, the 2.05 (37.350) rom can autoboot from it. :-)

Otherwise the machine doesn't really care about the A600 specific bits in the ROM.
Logged
 
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »