Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Best 1200 revisions?  (Read 3533 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline AkikoTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2002
  • Posts: 1026
    • Show only replies by Akiko
Best 1200 revisions?
« on: August 14, 2006, 11:16:31 PM »
Okay my 1200 has just died with black screen of death! My spare has a broken PCMCIA slot so I'm basically screwed until I find another. I have heard in past some revisions have timing issues? What revisions should I be looking for that won't cause issues with my BPPC card. thanks..  :-)
 

Offline r-tea

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Join Date: Feb 2005
  • Posts: 26
    • Show only replies by r-tea
    • http://www.ppa.pl/paubase/showuser.php?id=136
Re: Best 1200 revisions?
« Reply #1 on: August 14, 2006, 11:53:40 PM »
I had 14D revision and had some problems with BPPC, but to be honest, I didn't do too many attempts to find out which part causes those problems for real.
On the other hand I have heard that 14D is one of the best A1200 revisions. Maybe it's because this one is one of the latest?
/* Amiga Pegasos II PPC 750CXe @ 600 */
 

Offline Brian

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2003
  • Posts: 1604
    • Show only replies by Brian
    • http://www.syntaxsociety.se
Re: Best 1200 revisions?
« Reply #2 on: August 15, 2006, 12:06:54 AM »
All A1200 motherboards had timing issues though some late 1D1's was corrected in factory before being shipped if I'm not mistaking.

Timing fix "hack" for Rev1D4 and Rev2 can be found on AmiNet.

Offline Matt_H

Re: Best 1200 revisions?
« Reply #3 on: August 15, 2006, 12:08:11 AM »
1D4 and 2B supposedly have "timing problems" which can cause problems with multiple expansions attached. I haven't heard of any problems with other revisions.

1A and 1B have additional clockport pins, so make sure to connect the correct ones if you use clockport peripherials. The revisions are very uncommon, however.
 

Offline FrankBrana

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Aug 2003
  • Posts: 178
    • Show only replies by FrankBrana
Re: Best 1200 revisions?
« Reply #4 on: August 15, 2006, 12:09:27 AM »
I have a 1D4 revision, from one "recent" ( in amiga temporal terms ) batch, running with bppc rev0 ( which is known to be the most problematic one ) and I have had zero timming issues or strange lockups, etc.

Anyway, in tha page of ian stedman, is a guide of how to do the timming fixes to the 1200 mobbos, depending of the revision.

Tell he google "amiga ian stedman" and follow the rabbit :D
 

Offline jj

  • Lifetime Member
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 4054
  • Country: wales
  • Thanked: 2 times
  • Gender: Male
    • Show only replies by jj
Re: Best 1200 revisions?
« Reply #5 on: August 15, 2006, 12:28:32 AM »
well I have a 1A not had any problems wth timing issues.  And yes they are rare
“We don't stop playing because we grow old; we grow old because we stop playing.” - George Bernard Shaw

Xbox Live: S0ulA55a551n2
 
Registered MorphsOS 3.13 user on Powerbook G4 15"
 

Offline PG

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Feb 2004
  • Posts: 221
    • Show only replies by PG
Re: Best 1200 revisions?
« Reply #6 on: August 15, 2006, 12:32:44 AM »
There is an excellent support page from eyetech explaining the problem with some mainboard revisions:

Mainboard revisions

In addition to that i think that there are different revisions of the chips also.
This is only my speculations but i have had problems when repairing mainboards.
For example a perfectly working Gayle on one mainboard didnt work with another mainboard until i replaced the Alice chip also...

It could also explain why some people have problems and others have no problem with the same revision.
Everything would have been so much easier if they just had fixed the chipset instead of the mainboard workarounds..:-)
 

Offline PG

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Feb 2004
  • Posts: 221
    • Show only replies by PG
Re: Best 1200 revisions?
« Reply #7 on: August 15, 2006, 12:38:37 AM »
Quote

JJ wrote:
well I have a 1A not had any problems wth timing issues.  And yes they are rare


AAhhh..congratulations... :-)
I have also a 1A mainboard in one of my test computers and  its the absolutelly best revision in my opinion.
Its good to have for testing hardware..:-)
 

Offline jj

  • Lifetime Member
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 4054
  • Country: wales
  • Thanked: 2 times
  • Gender: Male
    • Show only replies by jj
Re: Best 1200 revisions?
« Reply #8 on: August 15, 2006, 12:43:57 AM »
never had any real issues, and got a Z4 busboard hanging off it, plus 040/25 603e 175

got my a1200 from currys in uk when they were released. was the sleepwalker pack

was supprised when i towered it that is was 1a
“We don't stop playing because we grow old; we grow old because we stop playing.” - George Bernard Shaw

Xbox Live: S0ulA55a551n2
 
Registered MorphsOS 3.13 user on Powerbook G4 15"
 

Offline AkikoTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2002
  • Posts: 1026
    • Show only replies by Akiko
Re: Best 1200 revisions?
« Reply #9 on: August 15, 2006, 01:12:36 AM »

Ok thanks guys :-) I will try avoid the 1D4 and 2B revisions!
My spare 1B board has this wire coming from the Budgie chip so I presume that it's been fixed. Unfortunatly it's last owner bust the PCMCIA slot :-(
 

Offline x56h34

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2003
  • Posts: 2921
    • Show only replies by x56h34
Re: Best 1200 revisions?
« Reply #10 on: August 15, 2006, 02:12:04 PM »
According to the Eyetech page, 1.D.1 is the revision to get.
 

Offline Colani1200

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2006
  • Posts: 707
    • Show only replies by Colani1200
Re: Best 1200 revisions?
« Reply #11 on: August 15, 2006, 02:37:58 PM »
Those hardware bugs are really an annoying part of AMIGA history. I don't want to know how many people left AMIGA because of having strange problems, lockups and thelike that were simply related to the revision of their hardware. I know at least one person who did so. Nowadays, at least you have the possibility to learn about these bugs (websites, forums etc.) and fix them, but remember how comparably limited possibilities were when AMIGA had its prime time...  :-(