Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: The most you can cram on a DD floppy  (Read 3797 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Brian

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2003
  • Posts: 1604
    • Show only replies by Brian
    • http://www.syntaxsociety.se
Re: The most you can cram on a DD floppy
« Reply #14 from previous page: May 01, 2006, 08:26:01 PM »
Hmm... how about powerpacking everything, executables, datafiles the lot and then have powerpacker.library and powerpackerpatcher take care of all the hazzle?

PPP unpack PP files on the fly in the background when a tool access suck a file so the tool itself doesn't have to be PP friendly.

Dunno if it's practical but you might squeze out some more from a dd disk that way compared to using lzx and you don't have to unpack it all from the start? Dunno if there's not some XPK compressions that's better than lzx?

Offline mr_a500Topic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2004
  • Posts: 865
    • Show only replies by mr_a500
Re: The most you can cram on a DD floppy
« Reply #15 on: May 01, 2006, 09:59:37 PM »
Quote
Hmm... how about powerpacking everything, executables, datafiles the lot and then have powerpacker.library and powerpackerpatcher take care of all the hazzle?


No, I already tried powerpacking and it is way bigger than a lzx archive. With all files powerpacked, it's still over 1Mb and wouldn't even fit on the disk.

Lzx makes the smallest archives, but I'd love it if somebody could prove me wrong. (with unarchiver <=21K)

I just realized I can include loadmodule and scsi.device 43 (optional startup - pressing F1 at boot) and use my bootdisk to access partitions beyond 4Gb if the boot partion is screwed up. (recover using multiple backups stored beyond 4Gb)

I'm off to create the best single Amiga bootdisk ever seen by human eyes... (only aliens will have seen better :-D)

Offline PG

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Feb 2004
  • Posts: 221
    • Show only replies by PG
Re: The most you can cram on a DD floppy
« Reply #16 on: May 01, 2006, 10:47:27 PM »
Cool project.. ;-)
 

Offline Trooper

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jul 2002
  • Posts: 133
    • Show only replies by Trooper
Re: The most you can cram on a DD floppy
« Reply #17 on: May 01, 2006, 11:32:24 PM »
Not sure how much i crammed on a single bootable floppy, But i used stonecracker to compress all the executables and called it ultrabench. I may have a look and see, As i still have the disk somewhere.

Trooper
Rainbow Islands: \\"The game is sometimes called \\"Bubble Bobble 2\\". However, two other games --\\"Bubble Symphony: The Story of Bubble Bobble 2\\" and \\"Bubble Bobble 2\\"-- claim the same name. Rainbow Islands happens after Bubble Bobble. Bubble Symphon...
 

Offline 3246251196

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Mar 2006
  • Posts: 334
    • Show only replies by 3246251196
Re: The most you can cram on a DD floppy
« Reply #18 on: May 02, 2006, 01:29:23 AM »
question: is LHA and LHX / LHZ all filetypes which AMIGAs (non of this EMULATION) understand?
******************
 

Offline Tomas

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 2828
    • Show only replies by Tomas
Re: The most you can cram on a DD floppy
« Reply #19 on: May 02, 2006, 01:43:39 AM »
It depends on how efficient the orginal data is packed. You can probably get like 10megs onto a single floppy if you compress a non compact txt file. If you compress a file that is already using a compressed format like a mpeg, divx, mp3 and so on, then you will most likely not be able to gain more at all by compressing it into zip, lha or so on..
 

Offline Tomas

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 2828
    • Show only replies by Tomas
Re: The most you can cram on a DD floppy
« Reply #20 on: May 02, 2006, 01:46:13 AM »
Quote
I already tried powerpacking all the large executables before adding them to the lzx archive, but surprisingly it made the lzx archive BIGGER. I guess the lzx compression works better on non-powerpacked files. I wouldn't even attempt to use a newer compressor like "RAR" because the unrar executable is a whopping 180K and uses huge stack and RAM to extract.

There is pretty much nothing to gain on compressing something that has already been compressed with something else.