Thing is...
My guess is that 99% of the users here have warez (considering the legal definition on what is warez and what is not) on their Amigas that they use on a rather regular basis, even some of the people that rage against against warez (or try to define what is warez and what isn't).
The problem is, though, that Amiga.org doesn't supoort this, and are against talking about warez, posting links to sites hosting warez and against everything warez in general. It is not that hard to understand, I think, and since that is the rules of this site the rules should be followed.
Fact: just because software is old, not commercially viable and/or available anymore doesn't make it legal to spread it around. The games, for example, hosted on the domain in question is warez. Period. No question about it. There is no such thing as abandonware.
However, OF COURSE things could (and should, according to me) be questioned, and people can take different stands on how to relate to the problem of unavailable software. Some won't go out there trying to get hold of a working copy of some 20 year old software, possibly paying money beyond what seems logical, to get hold of it, if the software is one click away. In some situations the software is technically doomed to never be available again, and what to do in those cases? Is it right or wrong for a private person to earn insane amounts of money off of selling some commercially unavailable software second hand, instead of the programmers or the company behind the initial release?
What is warez and what isn't, that isn't the difficult question to answer.
What is difficult is how to relate to the problem with unavailable software.
