Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Router suggestions wanted  (Read 6818 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Doobrey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2002
  • Posts: 1876
    • Show only replies by Doobrey
    • http://www.doobreynet.co.uk
Re: Router suggestions wanted
« Reply #14 from previous page: May 29, 2005, 11:09:01 PM »
Quote

bloodline wrote:
I'm using a Netgear DG834G Wireles ADSL Router which has a 4 port switch built in. Fantastic features (saveable settings, firewall, website block, keyword block, etc...), and good price :-D


Yup, I've had one of these for the last couple of weeks.
Absolute doddle to set up, although you should check Netgears website for updated firmware, as mine was about 3-4 revisions behind and had a few wireless problems before I updated it. :pissed:

The built in 10/100 switch is nice too, since my Amigas no longer slow down the PC-iBook transfers like they did with my old hub :-)
The wireless seems pretty solid, I spent all day in the garden with my iBook surfing and coding..

If only we had an Amiga laptop  :-(
On schedule, and suing
 

Offline mattabat

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Join Date: Sep 2004
  • Posts: 37
    • Show only replies by mattabat
Re: Router suggestions wanted
« Reply #15 on: May 30, 2005, 02:37:14 AM »
Most ADSL modems provide routing functionality; I only had to go out and buy a new $AUS40 8 port switch (with 10/100 autoswitching!) - now I find the single Ethernet port on my modem no longer worries me :)
 

Offline Floid

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2003
  • Posts: 918
    • Show only replies by Floid
Re: Router suggestions wanted
« Reply #16 on: May 30, 2005, 07:33:29 AM »
Quote

mattabat wrote:
Most ADSL modems provide routing functionality; I only had to go out and buy a new $AUS40 8 port switch (with 10/100 autoswitching!) - now I find the single Ethernet port on my modem no longer worries me :)


'Most' don't, but some do... and it cuts a few ways.  For instance, SBC-Yahoo (last I checked) still ships a straight Efficient Networks bridge for their PPPoE service, with the 2Wire products offered as a paid option (how I heard about that brand in the first place)... Qwest, I've discovered, run PPPoA on the wire, and are shipping an Actiontec modem-router to make that type of provisioning useful* -- which, unfortunately, has some bizarre quirks** in the present firmware that makes setting up a software PPPoE client (or a third-party router) seem like a walk in the park.


*I hope I have those details right; I gather DSL is 'always' based around ATM on the wire, but what matters is the type of framing expected at the endpoints.  Anyone familiar with Qwest want to correct me on that -- if the thing is normally run as a PPPoA client, but has the option to work in the bridged mode I'd usually use to run 'software' PPP on a known-PPPoE link, what the heck would that give out the Ethernet side, PPPoAoE?

**For being a combo device, there's a bug that appears to manage to hose DNS traffic running through it under an 'interesting,' if somewhat common set of circumstances.  I'm not sure if this relates to something trying to be a transparent proxy, or just a glitch in Linux/IP[Chains?|Tables?] and the way their device uses it, but I've reported a reproducible scenario to them, so maybe Qwest customers will be able to use Firefox on platforms that've heard of IPv6 shortly.   :-?