Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Can I use a Chinon 1.44 FZ-357 for A1200?  (Read 6363 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline TjLaZer

Re: Using Chinon FZ-357 in Amiga?
« Reply #14 from previous page: April 02, 2005, 04:03:14 AM »
The ones I have J2 was open and I had to put a solder blob to close it, then it works perfect with disk changes!  Not sure about a component being there, you must have a different run.  Find another drive that does not have anything at J2 and a quick way to ID a drive that will work is to look at the face plate:  If it has a "rounded" area around the opening (where you insert disk) it should work fine.  If it is "boxy" it will not work.  That is just my experience.
Going Bananas over AMIGAs since 1987...

Looking for Fusion Fourty PNG ROMs V3.4?

:flame: :banana: :banana: :banana:
 

Offline z36ra

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Mar 2003
  • Posts: 65
    • Show only replies by z36ra
    • http://www.atomiccomputers.com
Re: Can I use a Chinon 1.44 FZ-357 for A1200?
« Reply #15 on: April 02, 2005, 09:36:13 AM »
this may or may not help.

http://www.atomiccomputers.com/projects/amiga

..something I experimented with a while back.

mine has a panasonic. I like chinon.


Offline badalias

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Mar 2005
  • Posts: 57
    • Show only replies by badalias
Teac FD-235 HF 7373 on Amiga?
« Reply #16 on: April 02, 2005, 12:11:31 PM »
Hmm... Yeah, I read the whole page about 4 days ago, good details, wrong drives... I have a Teac FD-235HF 7373-UF and I've located the DS0/1 Solder pads, but can't make any sense of the rest of them... There seems to be enough of them, but, where do I start? Tried looking up details for this one on Teac's website, but I got no satisfaction...
 

Offline Argus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2004
  • Posts: 942
    • Show only replies by Argus
Re: Using Chinon FZ-357 in Amiga?
« Reply #17 on: April 02, 2005, 01:53:32 PM »
Quote

TjLaZer wrote:
The ones I have J2 was open and I had to put a solder blob to close it, then it works perfect with disk changes!  Not sure about a component being there, you must have a different run.  Find another drive that does not have anything at J2 and a quick way to ID a drive that will work is to look at the face plate:  If it has a "rounded" area around the opening (where you insert disk) it should work fine.  If it is "boxy" it will not work.  That is just my experience.


I tried this J2 solder fix on a "round" FZ357 and now it doesn't work at all.  Oh well, nothing ventured....  On a side note, I just put a sony 1.44 floppy in a older Rev. 2 A4000 and with a jumper change it does work as a dd drive but only with the manual diskchange command (which is not so bad as I hardly ever need to use floppies). It's white and a slim-line jobbie so it fits the machine color-scheme aesthetically. It will also recognize the floppy automatically if it is in the drive on startup.  The lesson: a little fiddlin' can go a long way on a pc drive.
posted on A2500+ C=2620 14MHz/8MbFast/1MbChip
dialed in @34K
Just livin\\\' the dream...
 

Offline badalias

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Mar 2005
  • Posts: 57
    • Show only replies by badalias
Fujitsu M2537B01B on Amiga?
« Reply #18 on: April 02, 2005, 02:57:17 PM »
Found another page... This one's about Fujitsu M2537B01B drives. - I have one of these too. Anybody feel like translating/interpreting this?
http://members.xoom.virgilio.it/_XOOM/amigazette/numero_03/drive_pc.html
 

Offline odin

  • Colonization had Galleons
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 6796
    • Show only replies by odin
Re: Fujitsu M2537B01B on Amiga?
« Reply #19 on: April 02, 2005, 03:02:37 PM »
Babelfish is your friend :-).

Offline badalias

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Mar 2005
  • Posts: 57
    • Show only replies by badalias
Re: Fujitsu M2537B01B on Amiga?
« Reply #20 on: April 02, 2005, 11:20:31 PM »
Quote

odin wrote:
Babelfish is your friend :-).


Not really, nor are Google language tools. Their translations both lacked the finnesse that a human translator could apply to make it understandable...