Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Why artist consider the human body an art?  (Read 4436 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Wain

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2002
  • Posts: 745
    • Show only replies by Wain
Re: Why artist consider the human body an art?
« Reply #14 from previous page: August 13, 2004, 03:45:18 PM »
Quote
These days art is more often about this shock value. It's a sham, controlled by a few very rich pretentious morons whose whole life experience can be summed up in the word 'valium'. They ran out of ideas a long time ago and can only try to grab an audience by using the worst taste possible.


From the renaissance and onward a large portion of art has always been about shock value, the whole point of 'Art' is communication, and it is often used to challenge people's sense of self, decency, morality, philosophy, politics, and anything else.  It is important that it be protected even if you find it stupid, insulting, degrading, pandering, and pathetic.  

There will always be a large quotient of schlock-art following the two or three people that are really doing something inventive and serious with their medium, and you will find people who are interested in making art even in pornography if you look hard enough (I used to work at a porn store).  

The hope is that the people who are just interested in pandering for cash will fall by the wayside over time, which usually does happen as their work is simply not memorable.
Professional Expatriate
 

Offline Wain

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2002
  • Posts: 745
    • Show only replies by Wain
Re: Why artist consider the human body an art?
« Reply #15 on: August 13, 2004, 03:48:50 PM »
Quote
It got me wondering.
Mona Lisa really did look very alike Leo himself. Did he ever get any daughters? That could explain a few things.
I mean, Mona Lisa wasn't a rich woman. IIRC, she is belived to have been a servant for some nobles in Florens. Maybe old Leo couldn't keep control of his lil' David.


He was a meticulous bookkeeper when it came to his work yet there are no records of the sittings for the painting, and the painting is unsigned.

from Da Vinci Morph
 "Dr. Lillian Schwartz of Bell Labs suggests that Leonardo painted himself, and was able to support her theory by analyzing the facial features of Leonardo's face and that of the famous painting, She digitized both the self-portrait of the artist and the Mona Lisa.  She flipped the self portrait and merged the two images together using a computer.  She noticed the features of the face aligned perfectly!  You may draw your own conclusion."
Professional Expatriate
 

Offline whabang

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 7270
    • Show only replies by whabang
Re: Why artist consider the human body an art?
« Reply #16 on: August 13, 2004, 03:51:46 PM »
Spoiler! Leonardo boinking the servants is a much more amusing thought! :-P

Twin sister?
Beating the dead horse since 2002.
 

Offline cecilia

  • Amiga Snob
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 4875
  • Country: 00
    • Show only replies by cecilia
    • http://cecilia.sawneybean.com/
Re: Why artist consider the human body an art?
« Reply #17 on: August 13, 2004, 03:54:03 PM »
as in dreams, every picture/sculpture/whatever an artists makes it's a kind of self-portrait. and i'm not being glib here.

my recollection is that Da Vinci carried this painting around for years and spent a long time working on it. and he never sold it. it obviously meant something special.
I've actually seen it - live and in person. it really is interesting. it's very subtle.
the no CARB diet- no Cheney, Ashcroft, Rumsfeld or Bush.
IFX CD Tutorial
 

Offline that_punk_guy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 4526
    • Show only replies by that_punk_guy
Re: Why artist consider the human body an art?
« Reply #18 on: August 13, 2004, 04:48:29 PM »
Quote
blobrana wrote:
Hum,
intersting, so the `mona lisa` is just a bit of canvas with some paint on it...
The real art was the sitter...?


It was in Da Vinci's head. His technique is important to this concrete impression of his vision, but even with his skill what made it to the canvas could never have lived up to his ideas.

(All IMO.)
 

Offline Wain

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2002
  • Posts: 745
    • Show only replies by Wain
Re: Why artist consider the human body an art?
« Reply #19 on: August 13, 2004, 05:48:05 PM »
Quote
It was in Da Vinci's head. His technique is important to this concrete impression of his vision, but even with his skill what made it to the canvas could never have lived up to his ideas.


This is pretty well supported by the whole 'never got her nose right' thing.   :lol:
Professional Expatriate
 

Offline GadgetMaster

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 2177
    • Show only replies by GadgetMaster
Re: Why artist consider the human body an art?
« Reply #20 on: August 14, 2004, 07:46:03 AM »
When I saw the thread title I thought it was going to be about the controversial corpse exhibitions.

See Here and Hereand Pictures here
 

Offline Glaucus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 4518
    • Show only replies by Glaucus
    • http://members.shaw.ca/mveroukis/
Re: Why artist consider the human body an art?
« Reply #21 on: August 14, 2004, 07:56:12 AM »
To nudity...  er, I mean art!  :pint:  ;-)

  - Mike
YOU ARE NOT IMMUNE
 

Offline Glaucus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 4518
    • Show only replies by Glaucus
    • http://members.shaw.ca/mveroukis/
Re: Why artist consider the human body an art?
« Reply #22 on: August 14, 2004, 07:58:10 AM »
Quote
Chris Davies, Liberal Democrat MEP for the North West England, said the two Conservative MPs "haven't seen it so they don't actually know what they're talking about".
Sounds like your typical concervatives...

:-D

  - Mike
YOU ARE NOT IMMUNE