Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Picasso 96 or Cybergrahpx?  (Read 2799 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline TjLaZer

Re: Picasso 96 or Cybergrahpx?
« Reply #14 from previous page: June 30, 2004, 02:59:01 AM »
Picasso96 is Faster.  I use that on my Cybervision 64 and Cybervision 64/3D cards and it runs awesome.
Going Bananas over AMIGAs since 1987...

Looking for Fusion Fourty PNG ROMs V3.4?

:flame: :banana: :banana: :banana:
 

Offline Abou27

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2003
  • Posts: 306
    • Show only replies by Abou27
    • http://www.renault-agriculture.co.uk/forums/
Re: Picasso 96 or Cybergrahpx?
« Reply #15 on: July 03, 2004, 11:18:25 PM »
I am also expecting to add a graphics card to my A4000 this week - a Picollo SD/64.  Is there anybody out there who has experienced this board on both cgx and p96 and could suggest which is best?  I am leaning towards cgx4 but don't know where to get it from!  I presume I am being very dense but I can't see where on their website one purchases it!  Are there many companies licenced to sell it?

I am getting really excited about getting the card, but know that it will probably take quite some setting up!  Oh well!  

Is it easy to swap between drivers?  I.E If I try the card out with P96 ,will it be easy to change, or should I just plump for one and stick with it?

P.S.  What do people reckon is a good top limit for case temperature in a desktop 4000?

Cheers:-)