Unofficial CyberGraphX v4 bug fixes

[Trev]

I think the point everyone is trying to make is if an Amiga developer--they're special, you see--opts not to support their software, there's f**k all anyone can do about it. ;-) This is true in enterprise environments as well, but it's understood and accepted that enterprises modify software in various ways to facilitate compatibility and interoperability. Behavior similar to SetPatch and SetFunction has existed in DOS and Windows for decades, for example.

[Cosmos Amiga]

@thread

whether or not it's ethical to modify commercial software for oneself is one thing. and documenting and/or distributing a binary patch may or may not be OK. but distributing (patched or otherwise) commercial software to which you do not have distribution rights is illegal in many jurisdictions, and linking to or posting such material on amiga.org is expressly against our terms of service. that's not a conspiracy -- that's the contract between the site and its members.

therefore anyone who attempts to distribute commercial software without permission from the software owner(s) -- whether in binary or in source or disassembled code forms -- will receive a vacation from the site.

@Cosmos

this isn't the first time you've done this. this is your final warning on the subject. don't do it here again.

-- eliyahu

I asked to close this thread...

I proved here with many examples : it's impossible to talk with the actual "Amiga Elite", it's always no answer and nothing change... The Classics 68k slowly dying, and they are happy with that...

No new fixed CyberGraphX version will appear, Karlos will never have the autorization, Bigfoot never reveal the 3dfx GPU bug he found for MOS drivers, Phase5/bPlan will never help to repair faulty cards...

I know very well my future, and I'll remember because I have a very good memory...


PLEASE CLOSE THIS THREAD !


;(