Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: chipset question  (Read 3100 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline bloodline

  • Master Sock Abuser
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 12114
    • Show only replies by bloodline
    • http://www.troubled-mind.com
Re: chipset question
« Reply #14 from previous page: January 28, 2013, 12:01:59 AM »
Quote from: Iggy;724344
PA-RISC?
Man, what a change.
Why was Haynie still working on AAA when Hombre' was in development?
In a PCI implementation, Hombre' could have breathed some life into the OS again.
And WinNT long before WinXT made the NT kernel common, too cool.

So guys, why are we PPC supporters so far off?
68K emulation, RISC, and discrete graphics?
Why don't you guys join US?
Even Commodore was giving up on extending the original Amiga architecture.
AAA and Hombre projects were running in parallel with the idea that the Amiga would be AAA powered and Hombre would be the next gen machine, possibly moving the Amiga platform (I.e. the OS) over to Hombre if anyone still cared about it... For Commodore Hombre and Win NT was the future platform (with cheap Hombre consoles covering the home market).


-edit- quick note to point out that PA-RISC was nothing like PPC. IIRC went on to become the Intel Itanium architecture... Could be off base about that...
« Last Edit: January 28, 2013, 12:04:47 AM by bloodline »
 

Offline Iggy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 5348
    • Show only replies by Iggy
Re: chipset question
« Reply #15 on: January 28, 2013, 12:14:30 AM »
Quote from: bloodline;724346
AAA and Hombre projects were running in parallel with the idea that the Amiga would be AAA powered and Hombre would be the next gen machine, possibly moving the Amiga platform (I.e. the OS) over to Hombre if anyone still cared about it... For Commodore Hombre and Win NT was the future platform (with cheap Hombre consoles covering the home market).


-edit- quick note to point out that PA-RISC was nothing like PPC. IIRC went on to become the Intel Itanium architecture... Could be off base about that...


ALL RISC shares some similarity.
Sounds like Hombre could have helped Commodore survive.
AAA was to little, too late.
And Motorola didn't intend to continue development of the 68K.
 `
"Not making any hard and fast rules means that the moderators can use their good judgment in moderation, and we think the results speak for themselves." - Amiga.org, terms of service

"You, got to stem the evil tide, and keep it on the the inside" - Rogers Waters

"God was never on your side" - Lemmy

Amiga! "Our appeal has become more selective"
 

Offline bloodline

  • Master Sock Abuser
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 12114
    • Show only replies by bloodline
    • http://www.troubled-mind.com
Re: chipset question
« Reply #16 on: January 28, 2013, 12:42:49 AM »
Quote from: Iggy;724348
ALL RISC shares some similarity.
Sounds like Hombre could have helped Commodore survive.
AAA was to little, too late.
And Motorola didn't intend to continue development of the 68K.
 `
Well, I'm not fan of PPC... I think it is bloated and feels like a compromise design. MIPS and ARM are much more beautiful IMHO. I know virtually nothing about PA-RISC, but I do know that Hombre planned to use several small PA-RISC cores as standard :-)

Hombre might have saved Commodore, but it would just have likely spelled the end for the Amiga... Which would have been relegated to the C64 position in the product line up.

Offline Iggy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 5348
    • Show only replies by Iggy
Re: chipset question
« Reply #17 on: January 28, 2013, 01:20:36 AM »
Quote from: bloodline;724351
Well, I'm not fan of PPC... I think it is bloated and feels like a compromise design. MIPS and ARM are much more beautiful IMHO. I know virtually nothing about PA-RISC, but I do know that Hombre planned to use several small PA-RISC cores as standard :-)

Hombre might have saved Commodore, but it would just have likely spelled the end for the Amiga... Which would have been relegated to the C64 position in the product line up.

Obviously I don't agree with you about the PPC.
And until recently ARM has been under powered.

MIPS holds no interest for me.
And PA-RISC is a dead issue. Although Commodore might have helped it succeed.

Hombre could have helped AmigaOS carry on if they'd followed through with that part of the plan.

As it is, the NG OS' resemble that idea.
« Last Edit: January 28, 2013, 01:31:21 AM by Iggy »
"Not making any hard and fast rules means that the moderators can use their good judgment in moderation, and we think the results speak for themselves." - Amiga.org, terms of service

"You, got to stem the evil tide, and keep it on the the inside" - Rogers Waters

"God was never on your side" - Lemmy

Amiga! "Our appeal has become more selective"