Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Microtek Z3i. A good fit?  (Read 2713 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline cgutjahr

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2003
  • Posts: 697
  • Country: 00
    • Show only replies by cgutjahr
Re: Microtek Z3i. A good fit?
« Reply #14 from previous page: December 19, 2012, 11:18:09 PM »
Quote from: Blinx123;719615
I actually only want the Z3i

These boards are known to be rather picky at what cards they accept and in which slots they accept them - their implementation of Zorro is  "just close enough" to get many things working somewhat reliable - other things (most notably RAM cards) simply don't work or work only half the time and/or in half the slots.

I had the predecesssor of the Z3i, and for a simple gfx card (Picasso 2) and an Oktagon SCSI controller it was okay. Not a performance miracle, but better than AGA/scsi.device I had used before.

The more cards you try to use, the less stable it gets (both mechanically and electronically). And don't even try to use one with a A4000 cpu card, that's a recipe for desaster.

Quote

for a possible future upgrade to PPC (this and the SCSI).

For network, you can (should) use a PCMCIA card. BlizzardPPC also means access to a Blizzardvision that I would prefer over a Mediator/Voodo-combination due to my experiences with Zorro bus boards ("don't cough near the computer or something will get loose"). For IDE/SCSI you can use either the BlizzardPPC or a FastATA.

Only sound and USB might require a bus board, but a Mediator + two PCI cards would probably be cheaper than some (quite rare, especially as far as USB is considered) Zorro cards. Luckily, I never felt the need for either of these.

Quote

Before that, I'll probably stick with either plain AGA or install a Mediator.

I'd stay clear of the Zorro bus board. 15 years ago, it might have been an option worth considering - but today, it's not worth the headeache IMHO.
 

Offline psxphill

Re: Microtek Z3i. A good fit?
« Reply #15 on: December 20, 2012, 01:12:49 AM »
Quote from: J-Golden;719730
Ug, the "Winner" board. You will not believe the headaches I got from trying to configure this with the rest of my system! It is the #1 reason why I only use big box Amigas now. It didn't line up right so cards were always flexing a bit. This was all in the Elbox tower too.

Yeah, I think I'd rather drop the money for an A4000T than try to bring an A1200 up to the same spec.
 
Elbox do a mediator for the 4000T http://shop.elbox.com/cgibin/shop?info=207M34T2&sid=22a0a353
 
The micronik tower itself looked cool, but it was just bits of plastic clipped together. http://www.amiga-hardware.com/display_photos/infinitiv.gif