Author Topic: Much need for 3.1? (Read 3610 times)

paul1981 · « **Reply #14 from previous page:** December 03, 2012, 06:38:58 PM »

For a Commodore Amiga purist, it would make sense to stick to 3.0 Roms as 3.1 I believe was never released by Commodore.

AmigaClassicRule · « **Reply #15 on:** December 03, 2012, 09:34:17 PM »

Quote from: paul1981;717326

For a Commodore Amiga purist, it would make sense to stick to 3.0 Roms as 3.1 I believe was never released by Commodore.

So you could do everything in Rom 3.0 like Rom 3.1?

MelbourneBen · « **Reply #16 on:** December 04, 2012, 03:17:15 AM »

Quote from: paul1981;717326

For a Commodore Amiga purist, it would make sense to stick to 3.0 Roms as 3.1 I believe was never released by Commodore.

But didn't Commodore write 3.1 before they went bump?

Methuselas · « **Reply #17 on:** December 04, 2012, 06:49:07 AM »

My old 3.1 kit was made by VillageTronic.

I'm also curious as to why H&P never released 3.9 roms?

stefcep2 · « **Reply #18 on:** December 04, 2012, 11:54:51 AM »

3.1 seemed more stable and faster.

Bamiga2002 · « **Reply #19 on:** December 04, 2012, 12:30:32 PM »

The question here could be? "Why NOT upgrade to 3.1?"

paul1981 · « **Reply #20 on:** December 04, 2012, 07:06:55 PM »

Quote from: AmigaClassicRule;717345

So you could do everything in Rom 3.0 like Rom 3.1?

Yes, except run OS3.5 or 3.9. But remember that you can softkick 3.1 if required.

desiv · « **Reply #21 on:** December 04, 2012, 07:41:56 PM »

Quote from: Bamiga2002;717437

The question here could be? "Why NOT upgrade to 3.1?"

The answer might be: "Because it doesn't add anything the user needs to do what they want to do."

:-)

desiv