To be honest, some parts could probably have used a better resolution. But as I didn't have a A3000 to test it on myself (only an AGA-machine with faster memory and 030/50MHz), I didn't want to take the risk of the framerate dropping too much. The 4bpl c2p-routines could probably be made faster, so maybe next time I'll try to do something in a higher resolution 
I actually thought it looked fine, despite the 160x120 resolution. Human eyes are more concerned with motion than they are high detail, so fluidity is better than sharpness if you have to choose.
What is copyspeed on the A3000 chip RAM anyway? There comes a point when your C2P is no longer the limiting factor, though I usually found that was into 68040 territory for AGA.