Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Quick Review of Icaros on VirtualBox  (Read 7531 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ferrellsl

Re: Quick Review of Icaros on VirtualBox
« Reply #14 from previous page: July 16, 2010, 05:08:07 PM »
Well, to be fair, I have to say that ANY OS that I've run under VirtualBox has been dog slow and fraught with problems....except for MS-DOS and it doesn't even qualify as a real OS.  You really should try AROS on real hardware.  It's very responsive.
 

Offline yakumo9275

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 301
    • Show only replies by yakumo9275
    • http://mega-tokyo.com/blog
Re: Quick Review of Icaros on VirtualBox
« Reply #15 on: July 16, 2010, 08:45:50 PM »
Quote from: Amigamia;570673

Quote from: Yakumo9275

Originally Posted by yakumo9275  
install in V for me was fine, I have full cpu virt on my intel quad core.

VirtualBox is not a good choice if your BIOS doesn't support Virtualization technology.


I understand, thats why I said I had full cpu virt. I have VT-x and VT-d in virtual box enabled in my intel cpu. I run lots of virtual box stuff (dual cpu windows 2000, xp, dual core freebsd, netbsd, linux, haiku) with no problem whatsoever, all with fast speed, bridged ethernet and between 1-3gb of memory per vm.

Icaros under virtual box was very flakey, the only times anything on virtualbox gave me issues.

I have quad core with 8gb ram on 64bit linux.
--/\\-[ Stu ]-/\\--
Commodore 128DCR, JiffyDOS, Ultimate 1541 II, uIEC/SD, CBM 1902A  Monitor
 

Offline MarkTimeTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2002
  • Posts: 901
    • Show only replies by MarkTime
    • http://www.tanooshka.com
Re: Quick Review of Icaros on VirtualBox
« Reply #16 on: July 16, 2010, 10:16:27 PM »
I meant to update my original 'quick review'

When I got home, I put Icaros on another machine where I have virtual box - it's a core 2 duo with SSD drive.

The difference was astonshing.

Yes, my Opteron 256 machine is an older machine, and doesn't support Virtualization - but why exactly is that important here?  That just means you won't get dual core support, but its not like Icaros needed another core.

I run Windows XP and Linux quite acceptably on the Opteron Box.

But in any event, yes a more modern machine, ran it great.
 

Offline vidarh

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2010
  • Posts: 409
    • Show only replies by vidarh
Re: Quick Review of Icaros on VirtualBox
« Reply #17 on: July 17, 2010, 01:08:08 AM »
Quote from: MarkTime;570740

Yes, my Opteron 256 machine is an older machine, and doesn't support Virtualization - but why exactly is that important here?  That just means you won't get dual core support, but its not like Icaros needed another core.


If the CPU doesn't have virtualization extensions Virtualbox needs to do para-virtualization, which involves one or more of a variety of hacks to trap and emulate any attempts by the OS use privileged instructions for example. It adds a tremendous amount of overhead whether or not the OS in question makes much use of the various functionality.