Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Amiga article on Ars Technica  (Read 2577 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ElPolloDiablTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 1702
    • Show only replies by ElPolloDiabl
Go Go Gadget Signature!
 

Offline cpfuture

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Feb 2006
  • Posts: 246
    • Show only replies by cpfuture
Re: Amiga article on Ars Technica
« Reply #1 on: June 14, 2010, 10:12:54 AM »
Cool! Thx for the link.

Offline bloodline

  • Master Sock Abuser
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 12114
    • Show only replies by bloodline
    • http://www.troubled-mind.com
Re: Amiga article on Ars Technica
« Reply #2 on: June 14, 2010, 11:02:45 AM »
The last paragraph sums up my feelings, actually the whole article is pretty good :)

Offline AJCopland

Re: Amiga article on Ars Technica
« Reply #3 on: June 14, 2010, 11:11:54 AM »
Excellent read, I was just coming to post this here :)
Be Positive towards the Amiga community!
 

Offline Karlos

  • Sockologist
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 16882
  • Country: gb
  • Thanked: 6 times
    • Show only replies by Karlos
Re: Amiga article on Ars Technica
« Reply #4 on: June 14, 2010, 11:26:06 AM »
Nice article.
int p; // A
 

Offline Piru

  • \' union select name,pwd--
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 6946
    • Show only replies by Piru
    • http://www.iki.fi/sintonen/
Re: Amiga article on Ars Technica
« Reply #5 on: June 14, 2010, 11:27:21 AM »
Nice article. The small technical inaccuracies don't really matter.
 

Offline drHirudo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2003
  • Posts: 539
    • Show only replies by drHirudo
    • http://hirudov.com
Re: Amiga article on Ars Technica
« Reply #6 on: June 14, 2010, 12:19:19 PM »
Quote from: Piru;564538
The small technical inaccuracies don't really matter.


Yes, its for wider audience than the Amiga crowd, where every small detail is nutpicked to dead. The people from outside will just enjoy it.

Offline runequester

  • It\'s Amiga time!
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 3695
    • Show only replies by runequester
Re: Amiga article on Ars Technica
« Reply #7 on: June 16, 2010, 05:43:26 AM »
very awesome :)
 

Offline paolone

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2007
  • Posts: 382
    • Show only replies by paolone
    • http://www.icarosdesktop.org
Re: Amiga article on Ars Technica
« Reply #8 on: June 16, 2010, 09:27:58 AM »
Quote from: Piru;564538
Nice article. The small technical inaccuracies don't really matter.

You can't be accurate when you have to deal with a broader, mainstream audience. People must be able to understand what's written there, so you can speak technically, but not-so technically to be appreciated.

Anyway, articles like this one make always feel me nostalgic, but on the other hand let me think how lucky current coders are, and how crazy/heroic old ones were, having to deal with problems that are currently resolved by libraries... or by suggesting users to buy better hardware.
p.bes

 

Offline Amiga_Nut

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2007
  • Posts: 926
    • Show only replies by Amiga_Nut
Re: Amiga article on Ars Technica
« Reply #9 on: June 16, 2010, 09:57:07 AM »
Quote from: paolone;564823
You can't be accurate when you have to deal with a broader, mainstream audience. People must be able to understand what's written there, so you can speak technically, but not-so technically to be appreciated.

Anyway, articles like this one make always feel me nostalgic, but on the other hand let me think how lucky current coders are, and how crazy/heroic old ones were, having to deal with problems that are currently resolved by libraries... or by suggesting users to buy better hardware.


I haven't read this specifically but I don't agree. you either avoid technical information OR you put factually correct technical aspects in an article. There is no middle ground really.....if I see a glaring mistake in a technical aspect how do I know the research for the whole article was done properly.

I've read their history of Amiga, and to be honest there are some real stinkers and confusion of chipset revisions of over half a decade like the difference between what 1987 A500 had compared to A1000 and A500Plus/A600 true ECS chipset so I can imagine ;)