WHY ON EARTH would one want to use Windows in an ATM or such?
Prolly for the same reasons someone might want to use AmigaOS, although, not likly.
The amount of comments people make about MS's security are ridiculous to say the least. Sure people can say that its not secure, not stable and not something else, but then Microsoft have the largest user base of any software in the world, so of course you'r gunna find more bugs and more complicated softwareis going to be written for it that has a great chance of bringing the system down. When people compare Windows to linux or AmigaOS they assume that linux and AmigaOS are more secure and more stable than windows but how can people make these assumptions? Based on the fact that major flaws just havnt been found yet? Thats stupid to say the least.
The reason why windows is constantly cracked and etc is because there exists known bugs that anyone can utilise to their advantage and MS has the wider coverage amoung script kiddies so their MS are likly to be the most targeted OS.
How do people know for a fact that AmigaOS, MorphOS, Linux etc are more stable/secure etc? We done, untill they have the type of userbase as windows.
I love my debian system and it doesnt crash unless i use ctrl+alt+#num to switch between console and X a lot, which is weird! And it does seem stable, but the applications i use are a lot more simple than the windows applications i used, besides mozilla apps. So i would assume that linux would be more stable.
If AmigaOS ever gets the type of userbase MS does, or even Apple, you may find a hell of a lot of memory leaks, buffer overflows and other things that make you realise that All software is crap and we really need some radical thinking and new designs to help us make software what it needs to be.
Or maybe we should just take some of the OpenBSD code? But even then, it doesnt have a great market share, but has somewhat proven to be very secure.