Come on now Sehund.
If you have a problem with what somebody writes on another site, please post a reply addressing that on that site, pointing out whatever inaccuracies you believe to have found.
Is it not enough that this site apparently finds someone else reporting on a new distributor of a POP mobo on another site so interesting that it warrants a news item, but we must also have meta-discussions about the discussions on another site and comment on individual users there?
Apparently, it almost made Tomas above believe that I was "filling slashdot with anti amiga" posts.
I made 6 posts/replies in that discussion, which at the time of writing has
403 comments! That's not "filling" with any kind of posts, and if someone think it's "poisoning" he's free to abstain from reading the comments or raising his browsing threshold or just try to endure the pain. Oh, damn, the other readers found it "interesting" and "informative", not "poisoning", so raising the threshold wouldn't filter it out. Guess you should've posted replies of your own then.
Nobody should have to feel even hinted at to stop expressing his opinion on one site only because someone on another site simply doesn't agree with him. That applies to everyone for any subject. When registering for an amiga.org account, a person doesn't sign a contract disallowing deviation in publicly expressed opinions from whatever the latest trademark-owning entity says at a given time.
Oh, how I despise the growing and suffocating sectarianism.