Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Lightwave 3D renderer for Linux  (Read 2668 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ValanTopic starter

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 173
    • Show only replies by Valan
    • http://www.creativepixels.com.hk
Lightwave 3D renderer for Linux
« on: July 26, 2002, 06:53:54 PM »
Newtek has released a FREE Linux renderer for Lightwave 3D.
For more, see NewTek's Press Release

If AmigaOS4 can be more efficient and stable than Linux there may be a chance that this renderer will be ported.


 

Offline Skyraker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 686
    • Show only replies by Skyraker
    • http://www.wolves.co.uk
Re: Lightwave 3D renderer for Linux
« Reply #1 on: July 26, 2002, 07:23:47 PM »
Ok I read this twice, nowhere does it mention an Amiga port... I do wish people wouldn't suffix their postings with wild speculation or wishlists...

I wouldn't have wasted my time reading it if I had known it had nothing to do with Amiga..

Best Regards

Skyraker.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
I have the body of an 18 year old ......... I keep it in the fridge.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
 

Offline Aegis

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 213
    • Show only replies by Aegis
    • http://www.survivorfilms.co.uk
Re: Lightwave 3D renderer for Linux
« Reply #2 on: July 26, 2002, 07:27:06 PM »
It's unlikely we'll see an Amiga OS port of ScreamerNet [7.5] - The whole point of releasing it on Linux is so people can set up renderfarms on i386 compatibles using a free OS.

Also, why would you want an AmigaOne as your render-node? I'd rather be running LightWave 8 on it and let Linux boxes do the network rendering...

 :-D
Catapultem habeo. Nisi pecuniam amnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam.
I have a catapult. Give me all the money, or I will fling an enormous rock at your head.
 

Offline Treke

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 45
    • Show only replies by Treke
Re: Lightwave 3D renderer for Linux
« Reply #3 on: July 26, 2002, 08:06:13 PM »
Quote
If AmigaOS4 can be more efficient and stable than Linux there may


Hm, I doubt, that 600Mhz G3 will be more usable to render something, than 2Ghz+ x86. It is not only an OS issue, but matter of the raw power.

re

Treke
 

Offline ValanTopic starter

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 173
    • Show only replies by Valan
    • http://www.creativepixels.com.hk
Re: Lightwave 3D renderer for Linux
« Reply #4 on: July 26, 2002, 11:27:57 PM »
Hi all,
I apologise sincerely for any confusion and wasting of time.

I showed my enthusiasm and excitement by not being more careful with my personal views.
 
Again I am very sorry.

Valan
 

Offline Jose

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 2871
    • Show only replies by Jose
Re: Lightwave 3D renderer for Linux
« Reply #5 on: July 27, 2002, 03:35:23 AM »
The 600mhz G3 of course not! But the 1Ghz G4, let alone the G5 will.
\\"We made Amiga, they {bleep}ed it up\\"
 

Offline arcticandyb

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2002
  • Posts: 412
    • Show only replies by arcticandyb
Re: Lightwave 3D renderer for Linux
« Reply #6 on: July 27, 2002, 05:07:07 AM »
@Valan

Actually I would say that people should read what you write more carefully, rather than mouth off without due consideration.

I read your post and sounded like a particular hope of yours, and did not imply Newtek would be writing anything for the Amiga.  I see nothing wrong with adding a particular desire at the end of a post, we all have them and it's perfectly reasonable of you to state yours where ever you feel like doing so.

I hope your enthusiasm is not muted by sour people.

Enthusiasm is what makes Amiga.org a more friendly place to send out your thoughts and I hope you will pay no attention to those that are less optimistic than you.
GPF (the famous Blue Screen of Death) honest version :-

The system has become busy or unstable.
Actually, we say \\"system\\" but what we really mean is \\"Windows\\".
If you like, you can wait and see if the \\"system\\" recovers.
It won\\\'t, but it will give yo