Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Ram-Handler Or AmberRam?  (Read 943 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline dannyp1Topic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2006
  • Posts: 664
  • Country: us
  • Gender: Male
    • Show only replies by dannyp1
Ram-Handler Or AmberRam?
« on: September 22, 2008, 01:28:24 AM »
I was wondering if maybe I could get some opinions as to which way I should go as far as which Ramdisk to use?  Is the Ram-Handler which comes with OS3.9 the best after updating it with the Amikit patch, or is AmberRam, which is available on Aminet a better choice?  What are the pro's and con's of each?  I am not a person who is hung up on "official is better".  I want the best.  I have seen quite a few posts on this site about official being best.  I can just see these guys driving around on bald tires and having leaky old windows on their houses when modern thermal-panes are available.  (;

Dan  
 

Offline ZeBeeDee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2007
  • Posts: 1081
    • Show only replies by ZeBeeDee
Re: Ram-Handler Or AmberRam?
« Reply #1 on: September 22, 2008, 01:54:02 AM »
Personally, I'd go with whatever one I was more comfortable using.

AmberRAM does seem to have a lot more going for it than the OS 3.9 RAM-Handler.

Why not give them both a try and see which one suits your needs best.
To err is human ... to BOING divine!

[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]