AINC VS HYPERION - Hyperion Lost?

[weirdami]

@lou_dias

I agree with your sentiment regarding AW.net's moderators, but all those mean graphics are being directed at me when I look at them. :-(

[Louis Dias]

weirdami wrote:
@lou_dias

I agree with your sentiment regarding AW.net's moderators, but all those mean graphics are being directed at me when I look at them. :-(

What is your username there?  And I believe I specified no one in particular but just generally the condsending, elitist know-it-all side that can't accept alternate possibilities to outcomes they never had any control over.

I said early on that if the ITEC contract is "in accordance with the 2001 contract" then those rules apply.  Then I got a beatdown saying that it's simply "no, it's I pay $25,000 and you give me OS4."  Seems the judge agreed with the former angle.

[coldfish]

You know things are bad when the drama surrounding OS4 is more interesting than OS4 itself.

What's on the other station?

[jorkany]

coldfish,

What's on the other station?

An ad for OS4.1

[jorkany]

Manu,

1. There is going to be a judical settlement between Amiga Inc. and Hyperion on which Eyetech and Itec will appear.

Since Itech and Eyetech are phonetically the same, I wonder if they'll have to refer to one in the courtroom banter as "with an 'I'" or something?

[Atheist]

jorkany wrote:
Manu,

1. There is going to be a judical settlement between Amiga Inc. and Hyperion on which Eyetech and Itec will appear.

Since Itech and Eyetech are phonetically the same, I wonder if they'll have to refer to one in the courtroom banter as "with an 'I'" or something?

Would that have anything to do with "An 'I' for an 'Eye'"? :-P ;-) :-)

[Atheist]

lou_dias wrote:

weirdami wrote:
@lou_dias

I said early on that if the ITEC contract is "in accordance with the 2001 contract" then those rules apply.  Then I got a beatdown saying that it's simply "no, it's I pay $25,000 and you give me OS4."  Seems the judge agreed with the former angle.

Hi lou_dias,

I read almost all of the threads and posts of the court cases over there.

And, I must say that they gave quite the wide latitude to the ones who were putting anti-Hyperion statements forward, and more than a few warnings to pro-Hyperion posters.

I left there quite a while ago over that issue.


BTW; "HE", I was meaning "Hyperion Entertainment" for short.

[Atheist]

I haven't read even one sentence anywhere of HE opposed to AOS5.0 being sold, anyhow. HE never opposed AmigaAnywhere2 being distributed.

I haven't read even one sentence anywhere of Hyperion Entertainment opposed to AOS5.0 being sold, anyhow. Hyperion Entertainment never opposed AmigaAnywhere2 being distributed.

Is the paragraph in full.
======

These two products are no threat to AOS4.x. One doesn't even exist!! Hahahahahahahaha!

OTOH, when they win the USPTO dispute, they may have something different to say about it. :-D

[Atheist]

So, Amiga Inc. Del.'s King Kong law firm made a mistake in pursuing the case in Del.? Some "experts"!

We'll know in 4 weeks whether Itec has cash or not. If they don't pay Hyperion Entertainment's lawyer by the end of Sept., then when the negotiations in Oct/Nov happen, Mr. Kinsel can call them the deadbeats that they are.

Or can he?

Can it be brought up in negotiations that the other party is untrustworthy to anything they may agree to, if Itec doesn't pay Hyperion's lawyer bill in total before the negotiation starts? (Since they can't bring up the hogwash Kent Arena scam?)