Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Is this feasable?  (Read 3946 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Wittgenstein

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Join Date: May 2002
  • Posts: 39
    • Show only replies by Wittgenstein
Re: Is this feasable?
« Reply #14 from previous page: July 16, 2003, 12:05:21 PM »
Quote

Well yes, but sample 749 (f1) will a mix of 50% from a filter that passes f1 and a 50% from filter that passes both f1 and f2 (however there is no f2 present at this position yet)

So hopefully you'll still get 100% of f1 through at this point
 


Yeah, but I was thinking more generaly now... If the spectras overlap and have different filters you will get something strange (50% from the output of filter 1 and 50% from the output of filter 2).

/W
Backworld /  Current 93 / Death in June / Fire + Ice /  Sol Invictus / TMLHBAC
 

Offline KarlosTopic starter

  • Sockologist
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 16879
  • Country: gb
  • Thanked: 5 times
    • Show only replies by Karlos
Re: Is this feasable?
« Reply #15 on: August 13, 2003, 02:10:20 AM »
@Wittigstein...

Been a while but I thought you might be interested to know that the idea sort of worked :-)

One thing I overlooked was the FIR filter algorithm has a N-1 latency in that for a 63 tap filter, you get 63 less samples out than went in - bit of a problem for the window length.

Some small corrections in the overlapping sorted that out, but I dont think the FFT is too accurate on smallerwindows..

Maybe I'll take another look later, right now I dont have the time  :-)
int p; // A