Rowbeartoe wrote:
Because I'm a skeptic, and must be convinced. Some people are just so biased, that they will say it can. I know you understand that. I was hoping to hear someone say, for example, that old ANIM players were limited to 30fps then improved.
If you're so desperate for proof, why not get an Amiga to try it out for yourself? It won't matter what anyone says here, because that won't be proof enough anyway. If someone replies "Yes, the Amiga can do 60FPS" that could just as well be bias to you. So why ask?
No offence dude, but you deliver a fair amount of bias in your own posts. And that's an understatement. Being a skeptic is one thing. Asking a question and not accepting the answer because you didn't like it is another. At some point it gets silly and annoying.
I'm mainly an Atari user, with an interest in the Amiga scene. Even though I have a preference for Atari machines, I recognize that the Amiga 500 always beat the ST when it came to animation and graphics. You most likely tried an old animation player which was limited to 30FPS, or watching an animation in an interlaced screen mode (in which case 60FPS isn't applicable due to obvious reasons). Later ones didn't have that limitation.
