-D- wrote:
(As an aside, Stanley Meyer was convicted as a fraud, and ordered to pay back some investors... I find it real hard to believe some redneck is going to build a fuel cell in his garage out of dryer-ducting, zip-ties and PVC. Of course, I could be proven wrong. :-P)
I've heard about this before. I can't be arsed to write a new reply, so please read my comments from a recent post I made elsewhere...
"
http://www.padrak.com/ine/NEN_4_8_3.html"That dream was shattered as Meyer was found guilty of fraud when his Water Fuel Cell failed to impress three "expert witnesses" who decided there was nothing revolutionary about it, rather that it was simply using conventional electrolysis.
The Sunday Times article also stated that when one of the court experts went to examine the Water Fuel Cell driven car, it was impossible to evaluate because it was not working."
If you read between the lines you see that Meyer was convicted of fraud because his invention wasn't working when it was assessed and three expert witnesses, who were probably experts in conventional electrolysis, saw the similarities and concluded there wasn't anything special about it. That doesn't mean his discovery doesn't have merit.
The fact is that the electrolysis technique Meyer discovered had already been demonstrated to work. He had to perform a demonstration to get his patents. More info here:
http://www.rexresearch.com/meyerhy/meyerhy.htm "
Thanks for reading. :-D