Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: A500 accellerators?  (Read 3652 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline HerbmanTopic starter

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Join Date: Mar 2006
  • Posts: 15
    • Show only replies by Herbman
Re: A500 accellerators?
« Reply #14 from previous page: July 10, 2006, 08:30:14 AM »
Quote

Even if you get an accelerator, you'll still need a Mini Megi for 2Mb chip to do anything useful and they're rare too (... but I have one!).


Mini Megi 2Mb? This I didn't realise? Why do you need one, and is it like a 1.5 Meg upgrade for the trapdoorslot underneath?

Quote

But I have seen GVP 030 accellerators for the A500 quite often on eBay (like this one). But sometimes the prices are a little crazy.


Yeah! Im bidding on it soon :)
A500 1.2 x5, A500 1.3 x9, A500+, A600, A600HD,
A1200, A1200HD
 

Offline doctorq

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2003
  • Posts: 2082
    • Show only replies by doctorq
Re: A500 accellerators?
« Reply #15 on: July 10, 2006, 09:13:59 AM »
The chip ram expansion isn't needed, but it's highly recommended. All graphics the computer displays depends on the chip ram, so the more the better. With only half a meg of chip ram you run out pretty fast if you want to use colourfull icons (NewIcons, GlowIcons), etc.
 

Offline alexh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2005
  • Posts: 3647
    • Show only replies by alexh
    • http://thalion.atari.org
Re: A500 accellerators?
« Reply #16 on: July 10, 2006, 09:14:54 AM »
You dont need a MiniMegi (MegaChip) if you have an A500+.

It is an agnus replacement with 1Mbyte of RAM that plugs into the Agnus socket.
 

Offline HerbmanTopic starter

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Join Date: Mar 2006
  • Posts: 15
    • Show only replies by Herbman
Re: A500 accellerators?
« Reply #17 on: July 10, 2006, 04:04:46 PM »
Quote

doctorq wrote:
The chip ram expansion isn't needed, but it's highly recommended. All graphics the computer displays depends on the chip ram.

Ok. So the FastRam in the accellerator doesn't fill this purpose?
A500 1.2 x5, A500 1.3 x9, A500+, A600, A600HD,
A1200, A1200HD
 

Offline doctorq

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2003
  • Posts: 2082
    • Show only replies by doctorq
Re: A500 accellerators?
« Reply #18 on: July 10, 2006, 04:26:39 PM »
Nope. Only way to avoid chip ram being used for graphics is with a graphics card, but that's gonna be a bit overkill and not very handy.

I would recommend getting the accelerator and harddrive controller first, and then you can find out if you really need more chip ram or not.
 

Offline cv643d

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2003
  • Posts: 1197
    • Show only replies by cv643d
Re: A500 accellerators?
« Reply #19 on: July 10, 2006, 05:28:27 PM »
I bought a couple of second hand amigas. One of the A500's had a Hurricane 030 25mhz with 4mb fast ram inside of it. I consider myself very lucky.
Amiga articles
"New shell. It was finished a while back, but I still see bugs, haha" - SSolie
 

Offline Karlos

  • Sockologist
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 16882
  • Country: gb
  • Thanked: 6 times
    • Show only replies by Karlos
Re: A500 accellerators?
« Reply #20 on: July 10, 2006, 07:00:45 PM »
I knew someone back in the good old days that had a lot of a500 hardware and topped it off with one of these bad boys. Easily the fastest still-in-the-original case A500 I ever saw. Cost an absolute fortune too...
int p; // A
 

Offline Crisisdog

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2004
  • Posts: 107
    • Show only replies by Crisisdog
Re: A500 accellerators?
« Reply #21 on: July 10, 2006, 08:17:15 PM »
Accelerators for the A500 are totally useless unless you get one with its own onboard RAM.  I had a board with a 50MHz 68030 and it didn't even increase the speed 20% per AIBB benchmarks.  I now have a 16MHz 68000 with 4MBs of same speed onboard memory, and am hitting an 80% increase in speed.  Pretty sad.

 :crazy:

 

Offline patrik

Re: A500 accellerators?
« Reply #22 on: July 10, 2006, 09:18:07 PM »
@Chrisisdog:

Yeah, the 030 has way to small caches to be able to give much performance when running code from slow memory.


/Patrik