Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: AMITorrent  (Read 1482 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline FluffyMcDeathTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2002
  • Posts: 3440
    • Show only replies by FluffyMcDeath
AMITorrent
« on: March 02, 2005, 07:36:27 PM »
What are people's experiences with AMITorrent and varies torrent clients on OS4.
I'm currently running AMITorrent for a 720MB file. Startup took ages and stuff is trickling in and out agonizingly slowly and everything is running slow now.
NetMon sees 50 to 80 kB/s of traffic but AMITorrent reports only 2kB/s of download and 4kB/s of upload.
I have 6 peers currently and the Errors: reads 1 almost all of the time. I'm not getting much of anything good right now and I feel like I'm probably a drag on the rest of the network I'm currently a part of.
Is this normal?
 

Offline adolescent

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2003
  • Posts: 3056
    • Show only replies by adolescent
Re: AMITorrent
« Reply #1 on: March 03, 2005, 12:05:28 AM »
Sorry, no OS4 experience, but have you tried the same torrent on another system?  Perhaps it's the peers themselves.  I've found some torrents that are  horribly slow and others that get decent rates.  (Although, even on the good ones I have never seen over 40kB/s).  
Time to move on.  Bye Amiga.org.  :(
 

Offline Ilwrath

Re: AMITorrent
« Reply #2 on: March 03, 2005, 01:09:44 AM »
Quote
Sorry, no OS4 experience, but have you tried the same torrent on another system? Perhaps it's the peers themselves. I've found some torrents that are horribly slow and others that get decent rates. (Although, even on the good ones I have never seen over 40kB/s).


Yeah... Same here.  No AmiTorrent experience.  The overhead number stated sounds way too high for the torrent traffic, though.  

Is AmiTorrent a port of Bram's official client, or one of the others?  On my PC, I stick with Bram's official client because it has a lot less overhead than some of the others I've used.  (Azureus is one of the worst offenders of overhead, though it also has some really nice features.)  On an official Bram's port, you shouldn't see more than 10% overhead.  On others, I've seen as high as 25%.  Yours appears to be still higher than that, though.

Anyhow, as adolescent says... Torrent speed depends almost entirely on the group of peers on the torrent you are downloading.  Not the raw numbers of peers, but the upload bandwidth of the few direct peers your computer picks out.  I've seen some well-seeded (200 seeds / 50 dl'ers) torrents crawl along, while some low-seeded seeded (5 seeds / 20 dl'ers) simply FLY.  BitTorrent has the potential to max your connection, regardless of what you have.  From a good site, it's not uncommon to see 200kB+ downloads, if your connection can handle it.  

Another thing to consider is your upload bandwidth.  There are two problems that can occur when you don't have enough upstream connection.  One is that if you don't upload enough, the BitTorrent client throttles your download speed, as you aren't seeding fast enough.  This just slows down the torrent evenly.

The other is (often times with CableModems) your file upload will saturate your connection to the point that it chokes your download by not allowing the "ACK" packets to be sent.  Your upload will be maxed and your download will drop to about 5kB/sec.  There should be a way to set your client to max out at about 80% of your upstream to avoid this problem.  

Anyhow, I've used BitTorrent a lot to download everything from old TV shows to Linux ISO CD images.  It's really a nice protocol.  I'm interested to hear more about how the OS4 one works out.