Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Amiga Inc auctioning off office and computers?  (Read 21139 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline quiesce

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Feb 2003
  • Posts: 72
    • Show all replies
Re: Amiga Inc auctioning off office and computers?
« on: May 19, 2003, 01:03:25 AM »
Quote
He will not directly answer the question, nor has he directly answered (yes or no) a lot of questions. He'll have some long, drawn out explanation -- like Gary who says that "the equipment being auctions is no longer being used" -- while carefully leaving out any similance of facts (in the case of the auction, it's not being used because they were evicted and the equipment seized, but God save the facts).

When he does, I will be certain to point out the inaccuracies of his statement.


Excerpt from "Weekly Q&A's with Fleecy Moss - Week 10"

Quote
4) Tigger: Where you unaware of what Bill McEwen was going to say in the Bolten Peck case about not being the CEO, or were you intentionally misleading the Amiga Community with your post that Bill McEwen was still the CEO??
Fleecy: Bill McEwen is still CEO. He was CEO before I posted that statement, he was the CEO when I posted that statement and is the CEO today as I type this answer to you. I have no comments to make about any on going lawsuits.  


That seemed pretty direct to me, but go ahead and point out the inaccuracies...
 

Offline quiesce

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Feb 2003
  • Posts: 72
    • Show all replies
Re: Amiga Inc auctioning off office and computers?
« Reply #1 on: May 19, 2003, 11:15:12 AM »
Quote
He didn't answer the question.

He was asked if he knew what Bill mcEwan was going to state in the
case regarding Bolton Peck.


No, but he addressed the question directly by saying he would not comment on law suites. He also addressed the implication behind the question for the benefit of everyone who kept saying he did not directly say that McEwen was still CEO, which needless to say, still won't be satisfactory for them.