Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Ben Hermans Interview - Take 2 - Submit your Questions  (Read 15048 times)

Description:

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Floid

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2003
  • Posts: 918
    • Show all replies
Re: Ben Hermans Interview - Take 2 - Submit your Questions
« on: August 04, 2003, 11:55:00 AM »
Okay, wandering out of the latest flamewar on ANN, here's what could be an interesting one...

Q:  Knowing what you know now, what would you nominate as the *worst* limitation of AmigaOS?  It'd be interesting to hear your perspective from the managerial standpoint, and more subjectively as a user.
 

Offline Floid

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2003
  • Posts: 918
    • Show all replies
Re: Ben Hermans Interview - Take 2 - Submit your Questions
« Reply #1 on: August 05, 2003, 02:56:24 PM »
Hate to steal any thunder, but... Some of these are pretty answerable.

Quote
shIva wrote:
is os4 multi user capable with usr/local/world rights ?
will the passwds (if multiuser capable) be md5 coded to be compatible to existing un*x systems ?
will there be a ssh2 shell ?
will the tcp stack support nat, routing, etc ?
Unless any big surprises are coming, we pretty much know 4.0 will be a single-user OS, though the little-used file ownership features of FFS may've been maintained in the 'FFS2' reimplementation.  (I honestly can't remember.)  MD5 is popular and free, so if and when anyone did require a strong hashing solution, they'd have to be a little nuts (QSSL) to roll their own.  The Roadshow stack has been claimed very modern, and should certainly handle routing, at least - maybe Ben can remind us of the featurelist for that.

Quote
will the desktop be exportable via xwin (vnc is not THE solution) ?
This is what troubled me to reply... Unfortunately, VNC *is* 'the solution' for exporting GUIs not intrinsically X11-based.  Some sort of X11 wrapper might not be impossible, but it'd be a heck of a lot of work -- consider how much code it'd take to 'translate' things like non-rectangular windows, unless you're talking export of the entire desktop like an X client, in which case it would be little different than using VNC anyway.

Now, if you really must have the X protocol, I was blathering about NoMachine a while back... Well, I dropped them a line, and received a friendly response.  Basically, their focus is elsewhere at the moment, but they *are* interested in supporting PowerPC Linux at some point (three letters: IBM), and they'll see where they can go from there as the marketplace evolves.