I do not know. I haven't licenced it. Ask Tobias and Alex whether this is a legimitate driver or not. And, as I said before, the uae part of the uaegfx component (written in C) is only the end-point of the 68K P96 endpoint of the driver. Whether *that* has been licensed and by whom I do not know.
Just for your information: If I'm the author, I can of course decide to change the license of some components under GPL if I like to. Or sub-license them.
So please, could you please stop to try to construct a case that P96 is under GPL, or its SDK is under GPL? It isn't. Or if you don't believe me, go get a lawyer to clarify.
Until then, could you just please be so kind and respect that Tobias and Alex did not want to put P96 under GPL or OpenSource? That was clearly their intention. Even if you do not like that.
The P96 uaegfx driver *is* licenced under the GPL whether you like it or not. This is a fact and as long as it is used in full accordance with the terms it is licensed under there is nothing you nor anyone else can do to stop someone using it whether you like it or not. I have not made the claim that P96 itself nor its SDK are licenced under the GPL, nor has anyone else. Please stop making false claims to win an argument, stick to facts and you can't go wrong. The uaegfx driver was licenced from Tobias and Alex by Cloanto and written by Brian King. It is as "official" as any of the other p96 drivers (with the exception of the Elbox driver).