Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Ben Hermans still staunchly against x86  (Read 43395 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline nicholas

Re: Ben Hermans still staunchly against x86
« on: November 08, 2010, 10:18:46 AM »
Quote from: Piru;590267
Well, I guess that's useful if you want to run the Clock application. Without alarm.

I fear the author is getting lost in his C++ quest (4 months now). I hope I'm wrong though.


What's wrong with C++?
“Een rezhim-i eshghalgar-i Quds bayad az sahneh-i ruzgar mahv shaved.” - Imam Ayatollah Sayyed  Ruhollah Khomeini
 

Offline nicholas

Re: Ben Hermans still staunchly against x86
« Reply #1 on: November 08, 2010, 01:50:32 PM »
Quote from: Piru;590285
Not the C++ itself (althought I don't like it myself, it sure has some benefits in some case), but I fear the author might be losing focus. Just an example: I know several guys who keep working on the same project, reshaping it to whatever new ideas they have and/or technologies arising. The problem being that the actual project itself doesn't advance.


I see, lack of design plus feature creep.
“Een rezhim-i eshghalgar-i Quds bayad az sahneh-i ruzgar mahv shaved.” - Imam Ayatollah Sayyed  Ruhollah Khomeini
 

Offline nicholas

Re: Ben Hermans still staunchly against x86
« Reply #2 on: November 08, 2010, 01:53:11 PM »
Quote from: bloodline;590284
He should have used Obj-C... ;)



No seriously, I'm joking! I think the task of moving thebold procedural code to C++ is quite a large one, but should pay off with better code efficiency :)


Whatever happened to Anubis and it's Obj-C nonsense? Early miscarriage?
“Een rezhim-i eshghalgar-i Quds bayad az sahneh-i ruzgar mahv shaved.” - Imam Ayatollah Sayyed  Ruhollah Khomeini