IonDeluxe wrote:
Yes I was referring to Genesi, the Amiga DE deal with MS was new product being sold under DE for MS...not really the same thing. Its kinda hard to hijack your own software base anyway
I thought it was the way AmigaInc alienated their other partners by choosing M$ over them. One of AmigaInc's partners ended up taking M$ to court. Of course choosing M$ alienated many Amiga users.
(M$ is responsible for swallowing up one of my favourite Amiga companies.)
I'm not sure what lies/rubbish from Genesi that you are refering to?
Well the glaring one is Gary Hare for CEO, but the list is pretty exhaustive dating back some two years ago.
[/quote]
Garry Hare is a real person:
http://www.ccon.org/conf97/program/speakers.html#Hare
Another one is: "we support the community and want OS4 on pegasos" When in actual fact they will do nothing to get OS4 on pegasos and expect AmigaInc\Hyperion to port it for them whilst also thumbing thier nose at the requirements for OS4 on thier machine.
What you probably mean is "who is going to pay for OS4 to be ported to the Pegasos?", right?
A Hyperion rep mentioned the development costs of OS4 being close to $5 million. So any port of OS4 to Pegasos would require a serious chunk of change.
There are 15+ operating systems being ported to the pegasos, most of these are being ported by the developers themselves and not funded by Genesi. Genesi is only supplying free boards and support for these boards.
Hyperion need to recover the development costs and the fastest way for them to do this is by finishing OS4 for the AmigaOne first then pursuing other markets for OS4.
Of course a certain 'far eastern' company would have a larger interest in investing in the OS4 project because they get to sell lots of AmigaOne PPC boards and funding OS4 is small amount of money compared to what is spent supporting Windows platforms.