OK I made some testing!
First I made those changes to choises file wich Chris sugggested. Performance increase was unbelievable!
friend_bitmap:1
window_simple_refresh:1
redraw_tile_size_x:100
redraw_tile_size_y:100
use_diskfont:1
font_sans:Topaz
font_serif:Topaz
font_mono:Topaz
font_cursive:Topaz
font_fantasy:Topaz
Noticed that both amigaworld.net and wikipedia.com renders correctly? What is happened? I opened wikipedia after amigaworld, no ghost images any more. No Graphics corruption at all?? Would it be that true type fonts made those graphic corruptions?? Or I don't remeber what you said about this friend_bitmap:1 was it originally only for AGA machine? Or is it just a amiga.org wich causes a problems, this time I didn't test amiga.org at all.
If you trust that Netsurf own clock amigaworld.net opens now 22 seconds, compared to arthurs version from aminet.net it took 38 seconds to render amigaworld.net. At least it feels much much more faster now. Arthur's version also corrupted screen when resizing window and eventually crash machine. Locks Computer for tens of seconds, compared to Chris version wich doesn't or does for a second for time to time.
Scrolling work nicely without true type fonts with Chris version

Tested Arthurs version was ixemul / no true type fonts version. Clib2 version didn't start at all.
Arthurs version also consumes more than 10mb more memory.
I also made fast test with my AGA / 68040 machine, even with that machine amigaworld.net opens 34 seconds. It even has 8mb ram free from 34mb after that (1.5mb chip and 7.2mb fast). Tried to made tests with Arthur's AGA version, but it crash machine after it renders start page.
So Chris, would you be kind and continue work with this, it is already useable. Considering that it has NONE optimications, wondering how fast it could be?
Notice one little annoying feature. I mistyped address, it took minits to timeout.