Consequences of the AmigaOS 3.1 source code "leak", one year after?

[Minuous]

What did the availability of the source code make possible?

The "Undocumented AmigaOS" document ( http://amigan.1emu.net/releases/UndocumentedAmigaOS.lha ), in the spirit of "Undocumented DOS", etc.

[Minuous]

AROS I believe is a recreation of 3.1, whereas we already have 3.9+BB1-BB4 that updates all of this.

Exactly. I don't know why AROS is considered to be a "NG" AmigaOS when it is just a clone of OS3.1. OS3.5 and OS3.9 have been out for about 17 years now. Still waiting for them to be supported by AROS.

[Minuous]

@fishy_fiz:

I merely pointed out a shortcoming of AROS x86, and you have responded with a personal attack for some reason. It is a fact and not "spewing crap" that it does not have proper 3.9 support, you can read the same thing on the official pages. No need to get angry and start trolling just because I don't think it is very useful in its current form; surely I have the right to an opinion without being vilified by yourself and/or other AROS zealots.

[Minuous]

Amino were willing to relinquish most of their IP for $1?

I am sure the Amiga community could have raised a bounty for $2 for "every Amiga copyright in the universe"...surely McBill would have wanted to raise as much cash as possible? Something strange here...